Comparison of perfectly matched layer and multi-transmitting formula artificial boundary condition based on hybrid finite element formulation

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Ning [1 ]
Xie, Li-li [1 ,2 ]
Zhai, Chang-hai [1 ]
机构
[1] Harbin Inst Technol, Sch Civil Engn, Harbin 150090, Peoples R China
[2] China Earthquake Adm, Inst Engn Mech, Harbin 150080, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
perfectly matched layer; multi-transmitting formula; elastodynamic wave; artificial boundary; hybrid finite element;
D O I
10.1007/s11589-007-0684-9
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
The theory of perfectly matched layer (PML) artificial boundary condition (ABC), which is characterized by absorption any wave motions with arbitrary frequency and arbitrarily incident angle, is introduced. The construction process of PML boundary based on elastodynamic partial differential equation (PDE) system is developed. Combining with velocity-stress hybrid finite element formulation, the applicability of PML boundary is investigated and the numerical reflection of PML boundary is estimated. The reflectivity of PML and multi-transmitting formula (MTF) boundary is then compared based on body wave and surface wave simulations. The results show that although PML boundary yields some reflection, its absorption performance is superior to MTF boundary in the numerical simulations of near-fault wave propagation, especially in corner and large angle grazing incidence situations. The PML boundary does not arise any unstable phenomenon and the stability of PML boundary is better than MTF boundary in hybrid finite element method. For a specified problem and analysis tolerance, the computational efficiency of PML boundary is only a little lower than MTF boundary.
引用
收藏
页码:684 / 695
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of perfectly matched layer and multi-transmitting formula artificial boundary condition based on hybrid finite element formulation
    李宁
    谢礼立
    翟长海
    Acta Seismologica Sinica(English Edition), 2007, (06) : 684 - 695
  • [2] A finite element formulation for perfectly matched layer
    Xu, XM
    Zhou, H
    Emson, CRI
    Trowbridge, CW
    Shirkoohi, GH
    ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD PROBLEMS AND APPLICATIONS (ICEF '96), 1997, : 96 - 99
  • [3] Multi-transmitting formula for finite element modeling of wave propagation in a saturated poroelastic medium
    Shi, Li
    Wang, Peng
    Cai, Yuanqiang
    Cao, Zhigang
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2016, 80 : 11 - 24
  • [4] A two-dimensional finite element formulation of the perfectly matched layer
    Polycarpou, AC
    Lyons, MR
    Balanis, CA
    IEEE MICROWAVE AND GUIDED WAVE LETTERS, 1996, 6 (09): : 338 - 340
  • [5] Perfectly matched layer absorbing boundary condition of finite element prestack reverse time migration in rugged topography
    Tang Wen
    Wang Shang-xu
    Wang Zhi-ru
    SECOND SREE CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING MODELLING AND SIMULATION (CEMS 2012), 2012, 37 : 304 - 308
  • [6] Finite element beam propagation method with perfectly matched layer boundary conditions
    Koshiba, M
    Tsuji, Y
    Hikari, M
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 1999, 35 (03) : 1482 - 1485
  • [7] Analysis on the seismic wave caused by low frequency sound source in shallow sea based on multi-transmitting formula artificial boundary
    Lu, Zaihua
    Ma, Yun
    Chen, Dandan
    JOURNAL OF VIBROENGINEERING, 2023, 25 (02) : 337 - 346
  • [8] Simulation of finite acoustic resonators from Finite Element Analysis based on mixed Boundary Element Method/Perfectly Matched Layer
    Laroche, T.
    Ballandras, S.
    Daniau, W.
    Garcia, J.
    Dbich, K.
    Mayer, M.
    Perois, X.
    Wagner, K.
    2012 EUROPEAN FREQUENCY AND TIME FORUM (EFTF), 2012, : 186 - 191
  • [9] Comparison of finite difference and mixed finite element methods for perfectly matched layer models
    Bokil, V. A.
    Buksas, M. W.
    COMMUNICATIONS IN COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2007, 2 (04) : 806 - 826
  • [10] The hybrid perfectly matched layer and finite element solution for open region problems
    Xiao, Y
    Lu, YL
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 2000, 36 (04) : 1635 - 1639