URORADIOLOGIC EVALUATION OF CHILDREN WITH URINARY-TRACT INFECTION - ARE BOTH ULTRASONOGRAPHY AND RENAL CORTICAL SCINTIGRAPHY NECESSARY

被引:26
|
作者
SREENARASIMHAIAH, V [1 ]
ALON, US [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV MISSOURI, CHILDRENS MERCY HOSP, DIV PEDIAT NEPHROL, KANSAS CITY, MO 64108 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS | 1995年 / 127卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0022-3476(95)70066-8
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the findings of renal ultrasonography (RUS), Tc-99m glucoheptonate renal scan (GHS), and voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) in children with urinary tract infection, Design: Prospective, masked, clinical study. Setting Single center, multidisciplinary, inpatients. Patients: Consecutive cases (N = 50) of children aged 2 months to 15 years (8 boys, 42 girls) with pyelonephritis in whom uroradiologic investigation was indicated. Measurements and main results: All patients underwent GHS, 48 had RUS, and 2 had intravenous pyelography. All but one of the patients had a VCUG. Fifteen children were found to have vesicoureteral reflux (6 unilaterally, 9 bilaterally), Of 96 kidneys evaluated by both GHS and BUS, 53 were abnormal by GHS versus 28 by RUS (a < 0.001), Findings of both GHS and US were normal in 36 kidneys and abnormal in 21 kidneys. In 32 kidneys only GHS showed abnormalities. In 7 kidneys only RUS showed abnormalities; 5 of them had mild to moderate pelvic dilation caused by reflux, which was confirmed in all 5 by VCUG. The VCUG demonstrated reflux in another four units with normal GHS and RUS findings, All combined, GHS and VCUG detected 62 of 64 abnormal renal units (96.9%), In the other two cases, RUS showed only focal hyperechogenicity of questionable importance. Conclusion: In the event that one elects to use GHS for the uroradiologic evaluation of children with urinary tract infection, it can be supplemented by VCUG alone, and RUS can be saved for special cases.
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 377
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] URORADIOLOGIC EVALUATION OF CHILDREN WITH URINARY-TRACT INFECTION - ARE BOTH ULTRASONOGRAPHY AND RENAL CORTICAL SCINTIGRAPHY NECESSARY
    SREENARASIMHAIAH, V
    ALON, US
    [J]. PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 1995, 37 (04) : A372 - A372
  • [2] IS RENAL SCINTIGRAPHY NECESSARY IN THE DIAGNOSIS AND FOLLOW-UP OF URINARY-TRACT INFECTION IN CHILDREN
    BENSMAN, A
    [J]. ARCHIVES FRANCAISES DE PEDIATRIE, 1993, 50 (10): : 930 - 931
  • [3] ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN THE RADIOLOGIC EVALUATION OF CHILDREN WITH URINARY-TRACT INFECTION
    ALON, U
    PERY, M
    DAVIDAI, G
    BERANT, M
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 1986, 78 (01) : 58 - 64
  • [4] IS RENAL SCINTIGRAPHY NECESSARY IN THE DIAGNOSIS AND FOLLOW-UP OF URINARY-TRACT INFECTION IN CHILDREN - RESPONSE
    PIEPSZ, A
    [J]. ARCHIVES FRANCAISES DE PEDIATRIE, 1993, 50 (10): : 931 - 931
  • [5] Consensus on renal cortical scintigraphy in children with urinary tract infection
    Piepsz, A
    Blaufox, MD
    Gordon, I
    Granerus, G
    Majd, M
    O'Reilly, P
    Rosenberg, AR
    Rossleigh, MA
    Sixt, R
    [J]. SEMINARS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1999, 29 (02) : 160 - 174
  • [6] CORTICAL SCINTIGRAPHY IN THE EVALUATION OF URINARY-TRACT INFECTIONS
    BREM, AS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 1994, 125 (02): : 334 - 335
  • [7] FALSE URORADIOLOGIC PATHOLOGY IN CHILDREN WITH URINARY-TRACT INFECTION AND FECAL IMPACTION
    PERY, M
    KAFTORI, JK
    ALON, U
    [J]. CHILD NEPHROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 1989, 9 (06) : 349 - 351
  • [8] Acute renal cortical scintigraphy in children with a first urinary tract infection
    Biggi, A
    Dardanelli, L
    Pomero, G
    Cussino, P
    Noello, C
    Sernia, O
    Spada, A
    Camuzzini, G
    [J]. PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGY, 2001, 16 (09) : 733 - 738
  • [9] Acute renal cortical scintigraphy in children with a first urinary tract infection
    A. Biggi
    Lorenzo Dardanelli
    Giulia Pomero
    Paolo Cussino
    Chiara Noello
    Ottavio Sernia
    Adriano Spada
    Gianfranco Camuzzini
    [J]. Pediatric Nephrology, 2001, 16 : 733 - 738
  • [10] Cortical scintigraphy and urinary tract infection in children
    Piepsz, A
    [J]. NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 17 (04) : 560 - 562