Comparison of Induction Characteristics of two Anaesthetic Agents: Etomidate-lipuro and Propofol for Day Care Surgery

被引:1
|
作者
Govardhane, Balasaheb Tukaram [1 ]
Basantwani, Shakuntala Nanikraam [1 ]
Pal, Ajay [2 ]
Magar, Jyoti Sandeep [1 ]
Tendolkar, Bharati Anil [1 ]
机构
[1] Lokmanya Tilak Municipal Med Coll & Gen Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol, Fourth Floor,Coll Bldg, Bombay 400022, Maharashtra, India
[2] Medanta Medicity, Dept Anaesthesiol, Crit Care, Gurgram, Haryana, India
关键词
Entropy; Etomidate-lipuro; Haemodynamics; Propofol; Side effects;
D O I
10.7860/JCDR/2018/31483.11224
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Induction of anaesthesia is the most critical stage of anaesthesia. Thus, an induction agent with less side effect should be used. Aim: To compare the newer formulation of Etomidate in lipid formulation (Etomidate-lipuro) and propofol-lignocaine admixture in patients undergoing day care gynaecological surgery. Materials and Methods: Hundred ASA I and II patients in the age group 18-60 years, scheduled for dilatation and curettage procedure were randomly allocated to receive either Etomidate-lipuro 0.2 mg/kg or propofol 2 mg/kg. Both groups received intravenous midazolam 0.05 mg/kg and fentanyl 2 mu g/kg as premedication. After induction with the desired agent titrated to Response Entropy (RE) 40, the time to achieve values to 40 (RE 40 time) were measured. Heart Rate (HR), Mean Arterial Pressures (MAP) were recorded at baseline, at induction and every minute for 15 minutes. Incidence of pain at injection site, myoclonus, apnea and thrombophlebitis were observed. Statistical analysis was done using Chi-square test and Student unpaired t-test. Results: Haemodynamic parameters (HR and MAP) were well maintained with etomidate. There was a significant decline in HR and MAP with propofol as compared to etomidate (p<0.001). Onset of anaesthesia (Time to achieve RE 40) was 81.22 +/- 2.79 s and 77.60 +/- 230 s in propofol and Etomidate-lipuro respectively (p<0.001). The incidence of pain was more with propofol-lidocaine admixture (40%) as compared to no pain with etomidate (p<0.05). None of the patients had myoclonus and postoperative thrombophlebitis in our study. Incidence of postoperative nausea was high with etomidate use (22%) than with propofol (14%) but statistically insignificant (p>0.05). None of the patient in our study had vomiting. Incidence of apnoea was higher with propofol (58%) as compared to etomidate (14%) (p<0.001). Conclusion: Etomidate-lipuro can be a valuable induction agent due to its haemodynamic stability and lesser side effect profile for day care surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:UC01 / UC04
页数:4
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] A clinical comparison of etomidate-lipuro, propofol and admixture at induction
    Saricaoglu, Fatma
    Uzun, Sennur
    Arun, Oguzhan
    Arun, Funda
    Aypar, Ulku
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2011, 5 (01) : 62 - 66
  • [2] Comparison of Induction Characteristics of Propofol-Lipuro and Etomidate-Lipuro in Cardiac Patients in Non-cardiac Surgery
    Kaur, Sarabjit
    Kataria, Amar Parkash
    Kaur, Gagandeep
    Kaur, Mandip
    Attri, Joginder Pal
    Mohan, Brij
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC STUDY, 2014, 2 (06) : 66 - 72
  • [3] Comparison of antimicrobial effects of dexmedetomidine and etomidate-lipuro with those of propofol and midazolam
    Keles, G. T.
    Kurutepe, S.
    Tok, D.
    Gazi, H.
    Dinc, G.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2006, 23 (12) : 1037 - 1040
  • [4] EVALUATION OF PAIN ON INJECTION, HAEMODYNAMICS AND POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING FOLLOWING INDUCTION WITH PROPOFOL, ETOMIDATE-LIPURO AND COINDUCTION WITH PROPOFOL
    Sharma, Kunal
    Mehta, Nandita
    Gupta, Sunana
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2018, 7 (02): : 176 - 180
  • [5] Comparison of the effects of remifentanil or fentanyl on anaesthetic induction characteristics of propofol, thiopental or etomidate
    Wilhelm, W
    Biedler, A
    Huppert, A
    Kreuer, S
    Bücheler, O
    Ziegenfuss, T
    Larsen, R
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2002, 19 (05) : 350 - 356
  • [6] WHICH INTRAVENOUS INDUCTION AGENT FOR DAY SURGERY - A COMPARISON OF PROPOFOL, THIOPENTONE, METHOHEXITONE AND ETOMIDATE
    HEATH, PJ
    KENNEDY, DJ
    OGG, TW
    DUNLING, C
    GILKS, WR
    ANAESTHESIA, 1988, 43 (05) : 365 - 368
  • [7] POST ANAESTHETIC RECOVERY FOLLOWING DAY-CARE SURGERY: COMPARISON OF TWO ANAESTHETIC TECHNIQUES
    Borgohain, Dhrubajyoti
    Bhattacharyya, Rajib
    Bora, Jyotishmoy
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2016, 5 (33): : 1777 - 1782
  • [8] A COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF HEMODYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE THREE INDUCTION AGENTS - ETOMIDATE, THIOPENTONE AND PROPOFOL
    Karki, Geeta
    Singh, Vishwadeep
    Barnwal, Abhishek
    Singh, Lalit
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2014, 3 (34): : 9133 - 9141
  • [9] Patient evaluation and comparison of the recovery profile between propofol and thiopentone as induction agents in day surgery
    Kern, C
    Weber, A
    Aurilio, C
    Forster, A
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 1998, 26 (02) : 156 - 161
  • [10] A Comparison of Hemodynamic Changes Between the Use of Etomidate and Propofol as Induction Agents for Anesthesia in Daycare Surgeries
    Giri, Sanjeeb K.
    Mohapatra, Partha S.
    Senapati, Laxman K.
    Mishra, Krishna
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (12)