Results of research on the causes of political violence are questionable owing to poor reliability of data and the tendency to combine violence perpetrated by several different actors in a general measure of ''political violence.'' Dynamic models and a focus on the context of violence allow examination of these issues. I compare an overall count of political deaths from The New York Times Index with a comparable count from a more complete database. The statistical inferences generated using the two measures are virtually identical. More important, disaggregating political deaths by the agency responsible for the deaths shows that anti-state violence, pro-state vigilante counterviolence, and state violence follow separate, distinctive dynamics. Although standard newspaper sources may provide reliable measures of political violence, they do not guarantee a complete examination of its complex dynamics.