MISSED PATHOLOGY FOLLOWING LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY - A CAUSE FOR CONCERN

被引:0
|
作者
DENNING, DA
LIPSHY, KA
机构
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Although many have recorded the incidence of complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, few have discussed the possibility of missing intra-abdominal pathology after this procedure. We have evaluated the first two years, September 1990-September 1992, of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in our community. Readmissions within 10 months of the original surgery with another diagnosis similar to gallbladder disease were considered ''missed pathology'' at the original surgical procedure. For the first 12-month period, 465 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed. Seventy-seven patients were readmitted, with 13 of these patients having other intra-abdominal pathology. These readmissions were for carcinoma (6), inflammatory bowel disease (2), diverticular disease, esophageal varices, and appendicitis. In the second year 429 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed; 59 patients were readmitted, with 10 of these patients having other intra-abdominal pathology. These readmissions were for carcinoma (3), inflammatory bowel disease (2), strongyloides, peptic ulcer disease, and abdominal pain of unknown etiology (3). Although intra-abdominal pathology was found in only 2%-5% of all patients having surgery for gallbladder disease, of the patients who were readmitted for ''missed pathology,'' 46% the first year and 30% the second year were readmitted for carcinomas. Several other diseases were found in patients whose symptoms mimicked gallbladder disease. It is therefore possible that in the zeal to perform a new procedure, other diagnoses may be overlooked.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 120
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY - POTENTIAL FOR MISSED PATHOLOGY
    WILLIAMS, I
    LLOYDDAVIES, E
    GANTA, S
    FOSTER, ME
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 1995, 77 (01) : 70 - 70
  • [2] LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY - POTENTIAL FOR MISSED PATHOLOGY
    WILLIAMS, I
    LLOYDDAVIES, E
    FOSTER, ME
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 1995, 77 (02) : 152 - 153
  • [3] LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY - POTENTIAL FOR MISSED PATHOLOGY
    OHANLON, DM
    DOYLE, JP
    KERIN, MJ
    FLYNN, JR
    ODONOGHUE, JM
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 1994, 76 (05) : 315 - 316
  • [5] Bile duct injury following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A cause for continued concern
    Wudel, LJ
    Wright, JK
    Pinson, CW
    Herline, A
    Debelak, J
    Seidel, S
    Revis, K
    Chapman, WC
    [J]. AMERICAN SURGEON, 2001, 67 (06) : 557 - 563
  • [6] Bile duct injury following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A cause for continued concern - Discussion
    Soper, NJ
    Behrman, S
    Murr, M
    Wudel, LJ
    [J]. AMERICAN SURGEON, 2001, 67 (06) : 563 - 564
  • [7] Laparoscopic cholecystectomy Risk of missed pathology of other organs
    I. Gál
    J. Szívós
    M. T. Jaberansari
    Z. Szabó
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 1998, 12 : 825 - 827
  • [8] Laparoscopic cholecystectomy - Risk of missed pathology of other organs
    Gal, I
    Szivos, J
    Jaberansari, MT
    Szabo, Z
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1998, 12 (06): : 825 - 827
  • [9] Major intra-abdominal pathology missed at laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Malouf, AJ
    Murray, AW
    MacGregor, AB
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2000, 87 (10) : 1434 - 1435
  • [10] Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: The missed diagnosis
    Hanney, RM
    Bond, G
    deCosta, A
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1997, 67 (04): : 166 - 167