COMPARATIVE STUDY OF EPIDURAL FENTANYL AND FENTANYL PLUS MAGNESIUM FOR POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA

被引:2
|
作者
Rashmi, N. R. [1 ]
Shashidhar, G. S. [1 ]
Sumitha, C. S. [1 ]
Devanand, B. [2 ]
机构
[1] Kidwai Mem Inst Oncol, Dept Anaesthesiol & Pain Relief, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
[2] Vijayanagar Inst Med Sci, Dept Anaesthesiol & Pain Relief, Bellary, Karnataka, India
关键词
Epidural Magnesium; Epidural Fentanyl; Postoperative Analgesia; NMDA Receptor;
D O I
10.14260/jemds/2016/502
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Magnesium has antinociceptive effects in animal and human models of pain. It is found that the addition of magnesium to postoperative epidural infusion of fentanyl may decrease the need for fentanyl. We undertook a study to compare the duration of postoperative analgesia after epidural Fentanyl and epidural Fentanyl plus magnesium administered postoperatively, along with side effects. METHODS AND MATERIALS 50 patients undergoing elective lower limb surgeries were randomized into one of the two groups with 25 patients in each group. Combined Spinal Epidural Anaesthesia was used for all patients. Spinal anaesthesia with 2.5 cc of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine was given. When sensory blockade regressed to L1, patients were given either 50 mu g of Fentanyl (Diluted to 6 cc with normal saline, Group F) or 50 mu g of Fentanyl plus 50 mg Magnesium (Diluted to 6 cc with normal saline, Group FM). Study drugs are administered by epidural route. Parameters like blood pressure, pulse rate, respiratory rate and oxygen saturation were monitored, and other side effects were noted STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Data were analysed by using Student t test and Chi-square/Fisher Exact tests. RESULTS There was significant difference in duration of analgesia between Group F (107 min) and Group FM (143 min). Haemodynamic parameters were stable in both the groups with minimal side effects. CONCLUSION Co-administration of magnesium along with fentanyl for postoperative epidural analgesia results in prolongation of fentanyl analgesia without significant side-effects.
引用
收藏
页码:2154 / 2158
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA WITH EPIDURAL FENTANYL
    LYTLE, SA
    GOLDSMITH, DM
    NEUENDORF, TL
    LOWRY, ME
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC ASSOCIATION, 1991, 91 (06): : 547 - 550
  • [2] Postoperative epidural fentanyl analgesia
    dosSantos, JET
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1997, 85 (02): : 463 - 464
  • [3] Postoperative epidural fentanyl analgesia - Response
    deLeonCasasola, OA
    Lema, MJ
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1997, 85 (02): : 464 - 464
  • [4] Walking epidural in labor analgesia: A comparative study of ropivacaine with fentanyl and without fentanyl
    Thacker, Avni
    Kheskani, Divya
    Panchal, Divyesh
    Chhanwal, Heena
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANAESTHESIA AND CRITICAL CARE, 2023, 13 (01) : 45 - 50
  • [5] CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL INFUSION OF FENTANYL FOR POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA
    BAILEY, PW
    SMITH, BE
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 1980, 35 (10) : 1002 - 1006
  • [6] Continuous epidural midazolam with fentanyl for postoperative analgesia
    Nishiyama, T
    Lee, C
    Hanaoka, K
    [J]. MANAGEMENT OF PAIN A WORLD PERSPECTIVE III, 1998, : 245 - 248
  • [7] EPIDURAL FENTANYL ANALGESIA FOR THE RELIEF OF POSTOPERATIVE PAIN
    DIETZEL, W
    POLOCZEK, L
    LEHMANN, KA
    [J]. ANASTHESIE INTENSIVTHERAPIE NOTFALLMEDIZIN, 1982, 17 (01): : 38 - 42
  • [8] COMBINATION OF EPIDURAL MORPHINE AND FENTANYL FOR POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA
    TANAKA, M
    WATANABE, S
    ENDO, T
    OKANE, M
    HAMAYA, Y
    [J]. REGIONAL ANESTHESIA, 1991, 16 (04) : 214 - 217
  • [9] POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA USING FENTANYL BY EPIDURAL ADMINISTRATION
    LOMESSY, A
    VIALE, JP
    MOTIN, J
    [J]. ANNALES DE L ANESTHESIOLOGIE FRANCAISE, 1981, 22 (01): : 17 - 21
  • [10] Postoperative patient-controlled analgesia with intravenous tramadol, intravenous fentanyl, epidural tramadol and epidural ropivacaine plus fentanyl combination
    Aygun, S
    Kocoglu, H
    Goksu, S
    Karaca, M
    Oner, U
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 25 (04) : 498 - 501