Comparison of four polymerase chain reaction assays for the detection of Brucella spp. in clinical samples from dogs

被引:13
|
作者
Boeri, Eduardo J. [1 ]
Wanke, Maria M. [2 ]
Madariaga, Maria J. [1 ]
Teijeiro, Maria L. [1 ]
Elena, Sebastian A. [3 ]
Trangoni, Marcos D. [4 ]
机构
[1] Zoonosis Inst Dr Luis Pasteur, Div Immunol & Diag, Dept Diag & Biol Prod Prod, Av Diaz Velez 4821, RA-1405 Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[2] Fac Vet Sci, Dept Theriogenol, Chorroarin 280, RA-1427 Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[3] Natl Hlth Serv & Food Qual SENASA DILAB OIE, Brucellosis Reference Lab, Talcahuano 1660, RA-1640 San Isidro, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[4] Natl Inst Agr Technol INTA, Ctr Res Vet & Agron Sci, Dept Biotechnol, RA-1686 Hurlingham, Buenos Aires, Argentina
关键词
Brucella; Brucella canis; canine brucellosis; clinical samples; comparison; molecular; polymerase chain reaction;
D O I
10.14202/vetworld.2018.201-208
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Aim: This study aimed to compare the sensitivity (S), specificity (Sp), and positive likelihood ratios (LR+) of four polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays for the detection of Brucella spp. in dog's clinical samples. Materials and Methods: A total of 595 samples of whole blood, urine, and genital fluids were evaluated between October 2014 and November 2016. To compare PCR assays, the gold standard was defined using a combination of different serological and microbiological test. Bacterial isolation from urine and blood cultures was carried out. Serological methods such as rapid slide agglutination test, indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, agar gel immunodiffusion test, and buffered plate antigen test were performed. Four genes were evaluated: (i) The gene coding for the BCSP31 protein, (ii) the ribosomal gene coding for the 16S-23S intergenic spacer region, (iii) the gene coding for porins omp2a/omp2b, and (iv) the gene coding for the insertion sequence IS711. Results: The results obtained were as follows: (1) For the primers that amplify the gene coding for the BCSP31 protein: S:45.64% (confidence interval [CI] 39.81-51.46), Sp: 95.62% (CI 93.13-98.12), and LR+: 10.43 (CI 6.04-18); (2) for the primers that amplify the ribosomal gene of the 16S-23S rDNA intergenic spacer region: S: 69.80% (CI 64.42-75.18), Sp: 95.62 % (CI 93.13-98.12), and LR+: 11.52 (CI 7.31-18.13); (3) for the primers that amplify the omp2a and omp2b genes: S: 39.26% (CI 33.55-44.97), Sp: 97.31% (CI 95.30-99.32), and LR+ 14.58 (CI 7.25-29.29); and (4) for the primers that amplify the insertion sequence IS711: S: 22.82% (CI 17.89 - 27.75), Sp: 99.66% (CI 98.84-100), and LR+ 67.77 (CI 9.47-484.89). Conclusion: We concluded that the gene coding for the 16S-23S rDNA intergenic spacer region was the one that best detected Brucella spp. in canine clinical samples.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 208
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Review of Detection of Brucella spp. by Polymerase Chain Reaction
    Yu, Wei Ling
    Nielsen, Klaus
    [J]. CROATIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 51 (04) : 306 - 313
  • [2] Polymerase chain reaction for the direct detection of Brucella spp. in milk and cheese
    Tantillo, G
    Di Pinto, A
    Vergara, A
    Buonavoglia, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 2001, 64 (02) : 164 - 167
  • [3] Detection of Brucella spp. DNA in the semen of seronegative bulls by polymerase chain reaction
    Junqueira Junior, D. G.
    Rosinha, G. M. S.
    Carvalho, C. E. G.
    Oliveira, C. E.
    Sanches, C. C.
    Lima-Ribeiro, A. M. C.
    [J]. TRANSBOUNDARY AND EMERGING DISEASES, 2013, 60 (04) : 376 - 377
  • [4] Molecular detection of Ehrlichia spp. in blood samples of dogs in southern Iran using polymerase chain reaction
    Derakhshandeh, Noushin
    Sharifiyazdi, Hassan
    Hasiri, Mohammad Abbaszadeh
    [J]. VETERINARY RESEARCH FORUM, 2017, 8 (04) : 347 - 351
  • [5] Detection of Brucella spp. in soft cheese by semi-nested polymerase chain reaction
    Tantillo, GM
    Di Pinto, A
    Buonavoglia, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY RESEARCH, 2003, 70 (02) : 245 - 247
  • [6] Direct polymerase chain reaction detection of Campylobacter spp. in poultry hatchery samples
    Hiett, KL
    Cox, NA
    Stern, NJ
    [J]. AVIAN DISEASES, 2002, 46 (01) : 219 - 223
  • [7] Polymerase Chain Reaction Detection of Salmonella spp. in Fecal Samples of Pet Birds
    Sareyyupoglu, B.
    Ok, A. Celik
    Cantekin, Z.
    Yardimci, H.
    Akan, M.
    Akcay, A.
    [J]. AVIAN DISEASES, 2008, 52 (01) : 163 - 167
  • [8] Detection of Brucella spp. and Leptospira spp. by multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) from aborted bovine, ovine and caprine fetuses in Iran
    Moshkelani, Saadat
    Javaheri-Koupaei, Mohamad
    Rabiee, Sadegh
    Moazeni, Mostafa
    [J]. AFRICAN JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY RESEARCH, 2011, 5 (26): : 4627 - 4630
  • [9] Detection of rodent Helicobacter spp. by use of fluorogenic nuclease polymerase chain reaction assays
    Drazenovich, NL
    Franklin, CL
    Livingston, RS
    Besselsen, DG
    [J]. COMPARATIVE MEDICINE, 2002, 52 (04) : 347 - 353
  • [10] IDENTIFICATION OF Brucella spp. FROM ANIMALS WITH REPRODUCTIVE DISORDERS BY POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION ASSAY
    Ghodasara, Sanjay
    Roy, Ashish
    Rank, D. N.
    Bhanderi, Bharat B.
    [J]. BUFFALO BULLETIN, 2010, 29 (02): : 98 - 108