Influence of Water Quality Index (WQI) on Biotic Indices of Benthic Macroinvertebrate at Highland Rivers in Kelantan and Pahang

被引:0
|
作者
Aweng, E. R. [1 ]
Aisyah, Sharifah S. O. [1 ]
Abas, Ahmad K. [2 ]
Fadli, Ahmad A. S. [1 ]
Azrinaaini, M. Y. [3 ]
Liyana, A. A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaysia Kelantan, Fac Earth Sci, Jeli Campus, Jeli, Kelantan, Malaysia
[2] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, Fac Sci & Technol, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
[3] Univ Malaysia Kelantan, Fac Agro Based Ind, Jeli, Kelantan, Malaysia
[4] Univ Malaysia Kelantan, Ctr Language Studies & Gener Dev, Jeli, Kelantan, Malaysia
来源
JURNAL TEKNOLOGI | 2015年 / 72卷 / 05期
关键词
Water quality index; biotic index; highland river; EPT index;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
A physicochemical survey of water quality and benthic macroinvertebrates at two rivers namely Sungai Dekong and Dawai in Lojing Highland was conducted on 23 and 24, January 2014. Three stations were selected for physicochemical water quality, one station at Sungai Dekong and two other stations at Sungai Dawai. On the other hand, benthic macroinvertebrates were collected at nine stations, i. e. three stations at Sungai Dekong and the other six stations at Sungai Dawai. Result shows that, Station 1 (Sungai Dekong) recorded Very Poor Biological Monitoring Working Party, BMWP (2.0-12.0), Poor Average Species per Taxon, ASPT (2.0-4.0), Poor Citizen Monitoring Biotic Index, CMBI (2.0-2.3), Fairly Poor Family Biotic Index, FBI (5.3-6.0) and Poor Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera or EPT Index (0.0). However, the Water Quality Index WQI (70.01) falls into Class III which can be categorized as Slightly Polluted River. On the other hand, Station 2 (Sungai Dawai downstream) recorded better Biotic and Ecological Index but lower Water Quality Index as compared to Station 1. It recorded Moderate BMWP (26.0-84.0), Very Good ASPT (5.3-6.5), Good CMBI (2.7-3.2), Excellent FBI (3.4-4.3) and Moderate EPT Index (2.0-5.0). However, the WQI (54.99) falls into Class III, and can be categorized as Polluted River. Finally, Station 3 (the most upstream station at Sungai Dawai) recorded almost similar Biotic and Ecological Index with Station 2 but in terms of WQI revealed a significant difference. Station 3 recorded Poor BMWP (34.0-46.0), Very Good ASPT (6.5-6.8), Good CMBI (2.9-3.1), Excellent FBI (3.1-3.9) and Moderate EPT Index (3.04.0). However, it's WQI (84.48) falls into Class II which could be categorized as Cleaned River. As a conclusion, physicochemical river water quality was not the only contributing factor to the Biotic Index at the highland rivers as per other factors such as river substrates, river discharge, aquatic plants, river riparian and river canopy.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The influence of land use on water quality and macroinvertebrate biotic indices in rivers within Castilla-La Mancha (Spain)
    Kroll, Stefanie A.
    Navarro Llacer, Caliz
    de la Cruz Cano, Maria
    de las Heras, Jorge
    [J]. LIMNETICA, 2009, 28 (02): : 203 - 214
  • [2] Performance of biotic indices in comparison to chemical-based Water Quality Index (WQI) in evaluating the water quality of urban river
    Ghani, Wan Mohd Hafezul Wan Abdul
    Kutty, Ahmad Abas
    Mahazar, Mohd Akmal
    Al-Shami, Salman Abdo
    Ab Hamid, Suhaila
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2018, 190 (05)
  • [3] Performance of biotic indices in comparison to chemical-based Water Quality Index (WQI) in evaluating the water quality of urban river
    Wan Mohd Hafezul Wan Abdul Ghani
    Ahmad Abas Kutty
    Mohd Akmal Mahazar
    Salman Abdo Al-Shami
    Suhaila Ab Hamid
    [J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2018, 190
  • [4] Water ecosystem quality assessment on rivers in Beijing City using benthic index of biotic integrity
    Zhang, Yuhang
    Yan, Xu
    Jiang, Bingqi
    Qu, Xiaodong
    Zhang, Min
    Zhang, Haiping
    Jing, Hongwei
    Liu, Baoxian
    Peng, Wenqi
    [J]. Hupo Kexue/Journal of Lake Sciences, 2023, 35 (06): : 2010 - 2021
  • [5] Water Quality Index (WQI) classification of rivers in agriculture and aquaculture catchments
    Baharudin, Fauzi
    Kassim, Jalina
    Imran, Siti Nurulhuda Mohd
    Ab Wahab, Mahyun
    [J]. 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 646
  • [6] Analysis of benthic macroinvertebrates and biotic indices to evaluate water quality in rivers impacted by mining activities in northern Chile
    Alvial, I. E.
    Tapia, D. H.
    Castro, M. J.
    Duran, B. C.
    Verdugo, C. A.
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE AND MANAGEMENT OF AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS, 2012, (407)
  • [7] Baseline assessment of benthic macroinvertebrate community structure and ecological water quality in Rwenzori rivers (Albertine rift valley, Uganda) using biotic-index tools
    Musonge, Peace S. L.
    Boets, Pieter
    Lock, Koen
    Ambarita, Naomi Minar Damanik
    Forio, Marie Anne Eurie
    Verschuren, Dirk
    Goethals, Peter L. M.
    [J]. LIMNOLOGICA, 2019, 75 : 1 - 10
  • [8] Assessment of the water quality of the upper reaches of the ouémé river in benin using benthic macroinvertebrate-based biotic indices
    Abahi, Koudjodé Simon
    Gouissi, Modeste Fadéby
    Akodogbo, Hotèkpo Hervé
    Sanni Worogo, Sorébou Hilaire
    Adje, Ayodélé Shola David Darius
    Gnohossou, Pierre Midogbo
    [J]. Revue des Sciences de l'Eau, 2020, 32 (04): : 433 - 444
  • [9] Bioassessment of multiple stressors in Afrotropical rivers: Evaluating the performance of a macroinvertebrate-based index of biotic integrity, diversity, and regional biotic indices
    Masese, Frank O.
    Wanderi, Elizabeth W.
    Nyakeya, Kobingi
    Achieng, Alfred O.
    Fouchy, Kelly
    McClain, Michael E.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2023, 11
  • [10] Development of a macroinvertebrate-based biotic index to assess water quality of rivers in Niger State, North Central Ecoregion of Nigeria
    Attobla Fulbert Assie
    Francis O. Arimoro
    Gilbert Ndatimana
    Unique N. Keke
    Adesola V. Ayanwale
    Edia O. Edia
    Augustine O. Edegbene
    [J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2024, 196