共 10 条
- [1] PLANNED-PARENTHOOD V CASEY [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1993, 270 (21): : 2559 - 2559
- [2] STEREOTYPING AND DIFFERENCE - PLANNED-PARENTHOOD V CASEY AND THE FUTURE OF SEX-DISCRIMINATION LAW [J]. YALE LAW JOURNAL, 1995, 104 (07): : 1875 - 1906
- [5] PLANNED-PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA V CASEY - THE REAFFIRMATION OF ROE OR THE BEGINNING OF THE END [J]. UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE JOURNAL OF FAMILY LAW, 1994, 32 (01): : 93 - 113
- [8] PLANNED-PARENTHOOD V CASEY - THE IMPACT OF THE NEW UNDUE BURDEN STANDARD ON REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH-CARE [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1993, 269 (17): : 2249 - 2257
- [9] UNITED-STATES V LEON AND ILLINOIS V GATES - A CALL FOR STATE COURTS TO DEVELOP STATE CONSTITUTIONAL-LAW [J]. UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LAW REVIEW, 1987, (02): : 311 - 353
- [10] STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-EQUAL PROTECTION-SPECIAL LAWS, COURT ACCESS, AND THE IMPACT OF TORT REFORM ON STATE EQUAL PROTECTION PRINCIPLES. WALL v. MAROUK, 302 P.3D 775 (OKLA. 2013). [J]. RUTGERS UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW, 2015, 67 (05): : 1235 - 1251