The Current Status of the Interventional Radiology Fellowship Match: Results of a Resident Survey.

PURPOSE: To survey residents who participated in the 2015 interventional radiology fellowship match regarding the overall process, including the number of interviews received, programs ranked, money spent, and perceived effect on board preparation. METHODS: An IRB-approved, anonymous web-based survey was distributed via email link to 151 individuals in 41 states who had interview at 1 of 2 IR fellowship programs in the United States. Most of the survey's 12 questions were based on a five-point Likert scale, while others were free-text response. RESULTS: Seventy-five out of 151 residents completed the survey (response rate 49.7%). When asked if the current timing of the core board examination worked well with the IR interview schedule, 62 (96.6%) either strong disagreed or disagreed. Sixty respondents (87%) reported that preparing for and traveling to IR interviews had a very negative or somewhat negative effect on boards preparation. When asked what change they would make to the timing of IR interviews or the core examination, 55 (79.7%) thought that IR fellowship interviews should occur earlier in the year. The median number of IR programs applied to, interviews offered, interviews completed, and programs ranked were 28, 13, 10, and 10, respectively. When asked how much money was spent on the application and interview process, 39% spent between $5000 and $9999, and 17% spent more than $10000. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial percentage of radiology residents who participated in the 2015 IR fellowship match have concerns about the proximity of board preparation to the match process. Consideration for restructuring the timing of this process is recommended. Copyright (c) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.