Analytical Framework for the Choice of Dispute Resolution Methods in International Construction Projects Based on Risk Factors

被引:21
|
作者
Gad, Ghada M. [1 ]
Kalidindi, Satyanarayana N. [2 ]
Shane, Jennifer [1 ]
Strong, Kelly [1 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Dept Civil Construct & Environm Engn, 456 Town Engn, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[2] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Madras, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
Dispute resolution; Risk management; Contract management; International;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000067
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
International construction projects provide opportunities for developing countries to advance in the global economy and for international construction and design firms to increase their profit and market share. Despite the attractive opportunities that international construction offers, international contractors are faced with many challenges and difficulties when moving into international markets. Many risks are associated with international construction, whether external or project-specific risks. Those risks affect how contract clauses are written, including the dispute resolution clause. This paper discusses the different dispute resolution methods employed in international construction contracts and develops an analytical framework (DRM-Risk matrix) suggesting the use of specific dispute resolution methods depending on the risks expected in the project. The matrix may eventually help international contractors in the selection of the appropriate dispute resolution method during contract formation depending on the risks involved in a project. (C) 2011 American Society of Civil Engineers.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 85
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] MAUT-based dispute resolution selection model prototype for international construction projects
    Chan, EHW
    Suen, HCH
    Chan, CKL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2006, 132 (05) : 444 - 451
  • [2] Pattern in the use of dispute resolution methods in the international construction industry
    Chan, Edwin H. W.
    To, Christopher
    Hills, Martyn J.
    Lam, Patrick T. I.
    [J]. AUSTRALASIAN DISPUTE RESOLUTION JOURNAL, 2005, 16 (01): : 65 - 78
  • [3] Understanding Intention to Use Alternative Dispute Resolution in Construction Projects: Framework Based on Technology Acceptance Model
    Lee, Chia Kuang
    Yiu, Tak Wing
    Cheung, Sai On
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LEGAL AFFAIRS AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION, 2018, 10 (01)
  • [4] Factors Affecting the Choice of Dispute Resolution Methods in Japan (with an Emphasis on Arbitration)
    Tseng, I-Ching
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION, 2007, 24 (03): : 211 - 230
  • [5] An Analysis of the Demarcation of Construction Projects for Dispute Resolution by Adjudication
    Ndekugri, Issaka
    Gyoh, Louis
    Ankrah, Nii
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LEGAL AFFAIRS AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 14 (02)
  • [6] Alternative dispute resolution in tunnel projects during construction
    Prasad, AH
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HYDRO POWER DEVELOPMENT IN HIMALAYAS, 1998, : 156 - 161
  • [7] DISPUTE RESOLUTION AIDED TOOL FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS IN EGYPT
    Marzouk, Mohamed
    El-Mesteckawi, Lobna
    El-Said, Moheeb
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2011, 17 (01) : 63 - 71
  • [8] Application of alternative dispute resolution in the field of construction projects
    Yaskova, Natalia
    Zaitseva, Larisa
    [J]. ENERGY MANAGEMENT OF MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES AND TRANSPORT (EMMFT 2017), 2017, 90
  • [9] Framework for the Successful Implementation of Dispute Boards in Construction Projects
    El-Sewafy, Tarek S.
    Waly, Ahmed F.
    El-Monayeri, Ola D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LEGAL AFFAIRS AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 14 (01)
  • [10] Identification of the relations between dispute factors and dispute categories in construction projects
    Ilter, Deniz
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW IN THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 4 (01) : 45 - 59