The Cambridge-Cambridge ROSAT Serendipity Survey .3. VLA observations and the evolution of radio-quiet and radio-loud objects

被引:21
|
作者
Ciliegi, P
Elvis, M
Wilkes, BJ
Boule, BJ
McMahon, RG
Maccacaro, T
机构
[1] HARVARD SMITHSONIAN CTR ASTROPHYS,CAMBRIDGE,MA 02138
[2] UNIV MILAN,DIPARTIMENTO FIS,MILAN,ITALY
[3] OSSERV ASTRON MERATE,I-20121 MILAN,ITALY
[4] ROYAL GREENWICH OBSERV,CAMBRIDGE CB3 0EZ,ENGLAND
[5] UNIV CAMBRIDGE,INST ASTRON,CAMBRIDGE CB3 0HA,ENGLAND
关键词
surveys; galaxies; active; nuclei; quasars; general; radio continuum; X-rays;
D O I
10.1093/mnras/277.4.1463
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
We present the results of the VLA radio observations at 1.475 GHz (20 cm) of the active galactic nuclei (AGN) in the Cambridge-Cambridge ROSAT Serendipity Survey (CRSS), a sample of 123 faint X-ray sources with f(x)(0.5-2.0 keV) greater than or equal to 2 x 10(-14) erg s(-1) cm(-2). Of the 80 AGN in the sample, seven show radio emission at the 5 sigma level and only two (2.5(-1.7)(+4.0) per cent) qualify as radio-loud (RL) objects (alpha(10) greater than or equal to 20.35). This result, compared with 13 per cent RL in the Einstein Observatory Extended Medium Sensitivity Survey (EMSS) sample of AGN [flux limit f(x)(0.3-3.5 keV) similar to 2 x 10(-13) erg s(-1) cm(-2)], confirms that the fraction of X-ray-selected RLAGN drops rapidly as the X-ray flux limit is lowered. Combining the CRSS AGN sample with that extracted from the EMSS we study the X-ray luminosity function (XLF) and evolutionary properties for radio-quiet (RQ) and RLAGN separately. We find that the RQ and RLAGN populations show the same cosmological evolution within the errors. In fact, when the luminosity evolution is parametrized with a power law of the form L(x)*(z) = L(x)*(0)(1+z)(k), we find k = 2.43 +/- 0.26 and 2.71 +/- 0.10 for RL and RQAGN populations respectively. In addition, the shapes of the de-evolved XLFs of the two classes appear to be different at both the low-luminosity (L(x) < 10(44) erg s(-1)) and high-luminosity ends, These results are robust for different cosmological models (using q(0) = 0.0 and 0.5) and for different values of the threshold alpha(10) used to distinguish between RQ and RL objects. Finally, we find that the differences in the shapes of the XLFs of RQ and RL AGN can be explained by introducing an X-ray beaming model to separate the observed X-ray luminosity of radio quasars into relativistically beamed and isotropic contributions.
引用
收藏
页码:1463 / 1476
页数:14
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] VLA observations of the Cambridge-Cambridge ROSAT survey
    Ciliegi, P
    Elvis, M
    Wilkes, BJ
    Boyle, BJ
    McMahon, RG
    Maccacaro, T
    [J]. EXTRAGALACTIC RADIO SOURCES, 1996, (175): : 543 - 544
  • [2] IRAS OBSERVATIONS OF RADIO-QUIET AND RADIO-LOUD QUASARS
    NEUGEBAUER, G
    SOIFER, BT
    MILEY, G
    YOUNG, E
    BEICHMAN, CA
    CLEGG, PE
    HABING, HJ
    HARRIS, S
    LOW, FJ
    ROWANROBINSON, M
    [J]. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1984, 278 (01): : L83 - L85
  • [3] DIFFERENTIAL EVOLUTION OF RADIO-QUIET AND RADIO-LOUD QUASARS
    SCHMIDT, M
    VANGORKOM, JH
    SCHNEIDER, DP
    GUNN, JE
    [J]. ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 109 (02): : 473 - 479
  • [4] EXAMINING THE RADIO-LOUD/RADIO-QUIET DICHOTOMY WITH NEW CHANDRA AND VLA OBSERVATIONS OF 13 UGC GALAXIES
    Kharb, P.
    Capetti, A.
    Axon, D. J.
    Chiaberge, M.
    Grandi, P.
    Robinson, A.
    Giovannini, G.
    Balmaverde, B.
    Macchetto, D.
    Montez, R.
    [J]. ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 143 (04):
  • [5] THE RADIO STRUCTURE OF RADIO-LOUD AND RADIO-QUIET QUASARS IN THE PALOMAR BRIGHT QUASAR SURVEY
    KELLERMANN, KI
    SRAMEK, RA
    SCHMIDT, M
    GREEN, RF
    SHAFFER, DB
    [J]. ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 108 (04): : 1163 - 1177
  • [6] 3C 57 as an atypical radio-loud quasar: implications for the radio-loud/radio-quiet dichotomy
    Sulentic, J. W.
    Martinez-Carballo, M. A.
    Marziani, P.
    del Olmo, A.
    Stirpe, G. M.
    Zamfir, S.
    Plauchu-Frayn, I.
    [J]. MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2015, 450 (02) : 1916 - 1925
  • [7] WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN RADIO-LOUD AND RADIO-QUIET QUASI-STELLAR OBJECTS
    HUTCHINGS, JB
    JANSON, T
    NEFF, SG
    [J]. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1989, 342 (02): : 660 - 665
  • [8] THE EXAMINATION OF OPTICAL MICROVARIABILITY IN RADIO-QUIET AND RADIO-LOUD QUASI-STELLAR OBJECTS
    JANG, MW
    MILLER, HR
    [J]. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 452 (02): : 582 - 587
  • [9] ROSAT observations of 3C radio-loud sources
    Prieto, MA
    [J]. MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 1996, 282 (02) : 421 - 435
  • [10] The radio-loud/radio-quiet dichotomy: news from the 2dF QSO Redshift Survey
    Cirasuolo, M
    Magliocchetti, M
    Celotti, A
    Danese, L
    [J]. MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2003, 341 (03) : 993 - 1004