EFFECTS OF ORTHODONTICS ON THE FACIAL PROFILE - A COMPARISON OF CHANGES DURING NONEXTRACTION AND 4 PREMOLAR EXTRACTION TREATMENT

被引:47
|
作者
YOUNG, TM
SMITH, RJ
机构
[1] WASHINGTON UNIV,DEPT ANTHROPOL,CAMPUS BOX 1114,ST LOUIS,MO 63130
[2] WASHINGTON UNIV,SCH DENT MED,DEPT ORTHODONT,ST LOUIS,MO 63130
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81796-2
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Cephalometric radiographs were used to examine soft tissue profiles of 198 orthodontic patients treated with full fixed appliances without extraction of any permanent teeth. Records were selected at random from five sources: cases treated by a Tweed Foundation instructor using the Tweed technique, patients treated with the Begg appliance, patients treated in one of two different practices with pretorqued, preangulated edgewise appliances, and patients treated in two stages with a functional appliance followed by full fixed edgewise appliances. The criteria for selection of cases and the methods of data collection were designed to allow comparisons with data collected by Drobocky and Smith on patients treated with extraction of four first premolars. Although the mean value of soft tissue changes were smaller in the nonextraction patients, the variability of these changes were generally as great as in the four premolar extraction cases. In addition, the percentage of undesirable facial changes was similar in the extraction and nonextraction samples. The results provide additional evidence that it is simplistic and incorrect to blame undesirable facial esthetics after orthodontic treatment on the extraction of premolars.
引用
收藏
页码:452 / 458
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of orthodontic treatment outcomes in nonextraction, 2 maxillary premolar extraction, and 4 premolar extraction protocols with the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system
    Cansunar, Hatice Akinci
    Uysal, Tancan
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2014, 145 (05) : 595 - 602
  • [2] Lip curve changes in females with premolar extraction or nonextraction treatment
    Moseling, KP
    Woods, MG
    [J]. ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2004, 74 (01) : 51 - 62
  • [3] Esthetic perception of facial profile changes after extraction and nonextraction Class II treatment
    Rocha, Andrea Damasceno
    Vieira Freire Casteluci, Cleomaria Evelyn
    Carvalho Ferreira, Fernando Pedrin
    Conti, Ana Claudia
    Almeida, Marcio Rodrigues
    Almeida-Pedrin, Renata Rodrigues
    [J]. BRAZILIAN ORAL RESEARCH, 2020, 34
  • [4] Facial changes in extraction and nonextraction patients
    Maina, DM
    [J]. ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 1999, 69 (06) : 485 - 486
  • [5] Facial changes in extraction and nonextraction patients
    Boley, JC
    Pontier, JP
    Smith, S
    Fulbright, M
    [J]. ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 1998, 68 (06) : 539 - 546
  • [6] Comparison of anterior crowding relapse tendency in patients treated with incisor extraction, premolar extraction, and nonextraction treatment
    Mahmoudzadeh, Majid
    Mirzaei, Hamed
    Farhadian, Maryam
    Mollabashi, Vahid
    Khosravi, Mahdie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE WORLD FEDERATION OF ORTHODONTISTS, 2018, 7 (02) : 61 - 65
  • [7] Profile changes following extraction orthodontic treatment: A comparison of first versus second premolar extraction
    Omar, Ziad
    Short, Lesley
    Banting, David W.
    Saltaji, Humam
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ORTHODONTICS, 2018, 16 (01) : 91 - 104
  • [8] Facial changes in extraction and nonextraction patients - Response
    Boley, JC
    [J]. ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 1999, 69 (06) : 486 - 487
  • [9] Characteristics of dentoskeletal morphology and treatment changes in 2-maxillary premolar extraction: A comparison with 4-premolar extraction
    Makino, Masashi
    Choi, Yoon-young
    Nojima, Kunihiko
    Nishii, Yasushi
    Sueishi, Kenji
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE WORLD FEDERATION OF ORTHODONTISTS, 2013, 2 (02) : E71 - E76
  • [10] Comparison of soft tissue profile changes in serial extraction and late premolar extraction
    Wilson, JR
    Little, RM
    Joondeph, DR
    Doppel, DM
    [J]. ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 1999, 69 (02) : 165 - 173