Chinese teachers' reconstruction of the curriculum reform through lesson study

被引:26
|
作者
Chen, Xiangming [1 ]
Yang, Fan [2 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Dept Educ & Human Dev, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Normal Univ, Coll Educ, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
Chinese teachers; Curriculum reform; De-contextualization; Lesson study; Re-contextualization; Reconstruction; Thematic teaching;
D O I
10.1108/IJLLS-02-2013-0011
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to reveal how the meanings of the current national curriculum reform in China changed in its transmission from the outside authoritative mandate to the local school practice through a case study of a lesson study on a reform practice called the "thematic teaching" in the Chinese language course. Design/methodology/approach - By a longitudinal study of the case for more than two months in a primary school in Beijing, China, the authors of this paper followed all the steps of the lesson study cycle conducted by all the Chinese language teachers in the school. Observations, interviews and document analysis were employed to capture the teachers' thoughts, actions and especially group interactions in trying to understand and implement this new reform practice. Findings - The study found that due to the marked differences between the professional reform discourse and the teachers' native discourse, the meanings of the reform tended to look alien to school teachers. In order to make meanings out of the reform, the teachers in this lesson study resorted to their own native discourse to understand the reform. Such strategies as "de-contextualization" and "re-contextualization" were found in the teachers' joint efforts to reconstruct and reenact the reform. Originality/value - This research points to the importance of school teachers' own belief system in teaching as revealed by their native discourse. Only by finding an adequate link between the outside reform discourse and the teachers' native discourse, can the national curriculum reform truly take hold in the school.
引用
收藏
页码:218 / 236
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Enacting curriculum reform through lesson study: a case study of mathematics teacher learning
    Shuilleabhain, Aoibhinn Ni
    Seery, Aidan
    [J]. PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN EDUCATION, 2018, 44 (02) : 222 - 236
  • [2] Curriculum design through lesson study
    Wake, Geoff
    Seleznyov, Sarah
    [J]. LONDON REVIEW OF EDUCATION, 2020, 18 (03) : 467 - 479
  • [3] Teachers' emotions and professional identity in curriculum reform: A Chinese perspective
    Lee J.C.-K.
    Yin H.-B.
    [J]. Journal of Educational Change, 2011, 12 (1) : 25 - 46
  • [4] Facilitating curriculum reforms through lesson study
    Lewis, Catherine
    Takahashi, Akihiko
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LESSON AND LEARNING STUDIES, 2013, 2 (03) : 207 - 217
  • [5] Developing teachers' and teaching researchers' professional competence in mathematics through Chinese Lesson Study
    Huang, Rongjin
    Su, Hongyu
    Xu, Shihong
    [J]. ZDM-MATHEMATICS EDUCATION, 2014, 46 (02): : 239 - 251
  • [6] Professional identities and emotions of teachers in the context of curriculum reform: a Chinese perspective
    Lee, John Chi-Kin
    Huang, Yvonne Xian-Han
    Law, Edmond Hau-Fai
    Wang, Mu-Hua
    [J]. ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF TEACHER EDUCATION, 2013, 41 (03) : 271 - 287
  • [7] Curriculum reform in a global context: a study of teachers in Jordan
    Al-Daami, Kadhum Khan
    Wallace, Gwen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CURRICULUM STUDIES, 2007, 39 (03) : 339 - 360
  • [8] Enhancing mathematics teachers' quality through Lesson Study
    Lomibao, Laila S.
    [J]. SPRINGERPLUS, 2016, 5
  • [9] Teachers’ professional growth through engagement with lesson study
    Wanty Widjaja
    Colleen Vale
    Susie Groves
    Brian Doig
    [J]. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 2017, 20 : 357 - 383
  • [10] Teachers' professional growth through engagement with lesson study
    Widjaja, Wanty
    Vale, Colleen
    Groves, Susie
    Doig, Brian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS TEACHER EDUCATION, 2017, 20 (04) : 357 - 383