Do volume and open interest explain volatility? An inquiry into the Indian commodity markets

被引:2
|
作者
Maitra, Debasish [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Management Technol, Ghaziabad, India
关键词
Volatility; India; Trade volume; Open interest; Asymmetry; Commodity markets;
D O I
10.1108/JFEP-04-2013-0012
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of the paper is to study the explainability of expected and unexpected trade volume and open interest as information flow, and the asymmetric effects of unexpected shocks to the information flow on volatility in Indian commodity markets. Design/methodology/approach - After having dissected into expected and unexpected components, the effects of trade volume and open interest on volatility are tested. A new interaction term is also added to measure asymmetry. Four commodities, namely, cumin, soy oil and pepper in food commodity category and guar seed in non-food commodity category are selected for the present study. These four commodities are selected based on their economic and trading importance, i.e. weight in the index and trading volume (liquidity). Findings - It is mostly found that unexpected volatility is positively related to the volatility, and the effect of the unexpected component is more than the expected component of the trading volume. The expected open interest is negatively related to volatility while the unexpected open interest is found to be positively related in all the commodities. The effects of unexpected component are higher than the expected open interest. The effects of positive unexpected shocks to the trade volume are more than those of negative unexpected shocks. The evidence of asymmetry in unexpected shocks to open interest is inconclusive. However, the inclusion of volume of trade and open interest could not vanish away the volatility. This indicates that the trading volume and open interest are not the variable with mixed distribution. Thus, it contrasts the assumption of mixed distribution hypothesis, and they do not proxy the flow of information. Practical implications - It is the unexpected information flow that matters more than the expected one. Positive unexpected shocks to trade volume are more influential than the negative shocks. However, trade volume and open interest are not good proxy of information flow in the Indian commodity markets. This study would definitely broaden the horizon of managers and policymakers to understand the volatility better. Originality/value - The paper is unique in terms of understanding the effect of expected and unexpected trade volume and open interest and the asymmetric effects of unexpected shocks to volume and open interest in the Indian commodity markets.
引用
收藏
页码:226 / 243
页数:18
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Do seasonality, break and spillover effects explain commodity price volatility: Evidence from the Indian commodity markets
    Maitra, Debashish
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRIBUSINESS IN DEVELOPING AND EMERGING ECONOMIES, 2018, 8 (01) : 144 - 170
  • [2] Volatility, trading volume and open interest in futures markets
    Floros, Christos
    Salvador, Enrique
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGERIAL FINANCE, 2016, 12 (05) : 629 - 653
  • [3] Open interest, volume, and volatility: Evidence from Taiwan futures markets
    Yen S.M.
    Chen M.-H.
    [J]. Journal of Economics and Finance, 2010, 34 (2) : 113 - 141
  • [4] Mispricing, Volume, Volatility and Open Interest: Evidence from Indian Futures Market
    Vipul
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMERGING MARKET FINANCE, 2008, 7 (03) : 263 - 292
  • [5] Volatility Spillovers in Indian Commodity Futures Markets and WPI Inflation
    Gupta, P. K.
    Ravi, Sunitha
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SCIENCES, 2013, 2 (03): : 36 - 55
  • [6] The macroeconomic variables impact on commodity futures volatility: A study on Indian markets
    Sreenu, Nenavath
    Rao, K. S. S.
    Kishan, D.
    [J]. COGENT BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT, 2021, 8 (01):
  • [7] The role of trading volume, open interest and trader positions on volatility transmission between spot and futures markets
    Ordu-Akkaya, Beyza Mina
    Ugurlu-Yildirim, Ecenur
    Soytas, Ugur
    [J]. RESOURCES POLICY, 2019, 61 : 410 - 422
  • [8] The macroeconomic determinants of commodity futures volatility: Evidence from Chinese and Indian markets
    Mo, Di
    Gupta, Rakesh
    Li, Bin
    Singh, Tarlok
    [J]. ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2018, 70 : 543 - 560
  • [9] Impact of the financial crisis on Indian commodity markets: Structural breaks and volatility dynamics
    Shalini, Velappan
    Prasanna, Krishna
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2016, 53 : 40 - 57
  • [10] Rebalancing effects of commodity indices on open interest, volume and prices
    Schmid, Florian
    Mayer, Herbert
    Wanner, Markus
    Rathgeber, Andreas W.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2023, 29 (10): : 1187 - 1206