Early Detection, Intervention, and Prevention of Psychosis Program: Rationale, Design, and Sample Description

被引:21
|
作者
McFarlane, William R. [1 ]
Cook, William L. [1 ]
Downing, Donna [2 ]
Ruff, Anita [3 ]
Lynch, Sarah [1 ]
Adelsheim, Steven [4 ]
Calkins, Roderick [5 ]
Carter, Cameron S. [6 ]
Cornblatt, Barbara [7 ]
Milner, Karen [8 ]
机构
[1] Maine Med Ctr, Ctr Psychiat Res, 22 Bramhall St, Portland, ME 04102 USA
[2] Univ New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824 USA
[3] Maine Hlth Inc, Portland, ME USA
[4] Univ New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
[5] Mid Valley Behav Healthcare Network, Salem, OR USA
[6] Univ Calif Davis, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[7] Zucker Hillside Hosp, Glen Oaks, NY USA
[8] Washtenaw Community Hlth Org, Early Detect Prevent Psychosis Program Grp, Ypsilanti, MI USA
关键词
Adolescents; psychosis; prevention; early intervention; risk; prodromal psychosis;
D O I
10.2174/2210676611202020112
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Objective: To describe the rationale, design, intervention, and sample characteristics of the Early Detection, Intervention, and Prevention of Psychosis Program (EDIPPP), a multi-site study of the effectiveness of Family-Aided Assertive Community Treatment (FACT) in preventing the onset of psychosis in a nationally representative sample of atrisk young people. Methods: Young people (age 12-25) and their families are assigned to a clinical high risk (CHR) group or a low risk group based on severity of positive symptoms of psychosis. Treatment families (CHR group) receive minimally 1 year of FACT and comparison families (low risk group) receive community care and monthly assessments. Initial betweengroups differences on key variables are statistically controlled according to procedures of the regression discontinuity design (RDD), so any emerging between-group differences in outcomes can be attributed to treatments. Results: 337 young people (mean age 16.6) were assigned to the treatment group (n = 250) or comparison group (n = 87). 86% of the CHR sample met DSM-IV criteria for an Axis I disorder. The RDD procedure successfully removed betweengroup differences in baseline scores on all but one of the key outcome variables. Conclusion: Six sites located in 4 distinct regions of the U.S. have successfully collaborated in the initial phase of a largesample test of FACT in preventing the onset of psychosis. Treatment outcome findings and other research initiated at individual sites will significantly increase our knowledge of the early phases of psychotic illness and the factors that may prevent it.
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 124
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Rationale and state of the art in early detection and intervention in psychosis
    Dominguez Martinez, Tecelli
    Manel Blanque, Joan
    Codina, Jordi
    Montoro, Monica
    Mauri, Lluis
    Barrantes-Vidal, Neus
    SALUD MENTAL, 2011, 34 (04) : 341 - 350
  • [2] Description of the development of a community-based early intervention program: prevention and recovery in early psychosis (PREP)
    Hardy, Kate
    Loewy, Rachel
    Olshan, Perry
    Moore, Melissa
    Rose, Demian
    Jackson-Lane, Carletta
    Gause, Michael
    Jackson, Alma
    Bennett, Bob
    EARLY INTERVENTION IN PSYCHIATRY, 2012, 6 : 17 - 17
  • [3] Prevention program in psychosis (P3): A Spanish early detection and intervention project
    Lemos-Giraldez, S.
    Vallina-Fernandez, O.
    Fernandez-Iglesias, P.
    Ortega-Ferrandez, J. A.
    Garcia-Pelayo, P.
    Guitierrez-Menendez, A. M.
    SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2006, 86 : S19 - S20
  • [4] Early Detection, Intervention and Prevention of Psychosis Program: Community Outreach and Early Identification at Six US Sites
    Lynch, Sarah
    McFarlane, William R.
    Joly, Brenda
    Adelsheim, Steven
    Auther, Andrea
    Cornblatt, Barbara A.
    Migliorati, Margaret
    Ragland, J. Daniel
    Sale, Tamara
    Spring, Elizabeth
    Calkins, Roderick
    Carter, Cameron S.
    Jaynes, Rebecca
    Taylor, Stephan F.
    Downing, Donna
    PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 2016, 67 (05) : 510 - 516
  • [5] Early intervention in psychosis - Rationale and evidence for effectiveness
    Reading, B
    Birchwood, M
    DISEASE MANAGEMENT & HEALTH OUTCOMES, 2005, 13 (01) : 53 - 63
  • [6] Factor analysis of the Scale of Prodromal Symptoms: data from the Early Detection and Intervention for the Prevention of Psychosis Program
    Tso, Ivy F.
    Taylor, Stephan F.
    Grove, Tyler B.
    Niendam, Tara
    Adelsheim, Steven
    Auther, Andrea
    Cornblatt, Barbara
    Carter, Cameron S.
    Calkins, Roderick
    Ragland, J. Daniel
    Sale, Tamara
    McFarlane, William R.
    EARLY INTERVENTION IN PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 11 (01) : 14 - 22
  • [7] PSYCHOSIS PREVENTION AND EARLY INTERVENTION IN HUNGARY
    Keri, Szabolcs
    CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHIATRY, 2008, 5 (06): : 295 - 302
  • [8] Specialized early intervention program for psychosis is effective in prevention of disengagement from services
    Ando, Shuntaro
    Nishida, Atsushi
    Koike, Shinsuke
    Yamasaki, Syudo
    Ishikura, Shigeko
    Aono, Etsuko
    Harima, Hirohiko
    Wakeshima, Toru
    Asukai, Nozomu
    Okazaki, Yuji
    EARLY INTERVENTION IN PSYCHIATRY, 2012, 6 : 95 - 95
  • [9] Family intervention in an early psychosis program
    Hassall, L
    Norman, R
    Neels, C
    SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2004, 70 (01) : 64 - 64
  • [10] Family intervention program in early psychosis
    Gosselin, D
    Viau, H
    Bergeron-Leclerc, C
    Roy, MA
    SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2004, 70 (01) : 85 - 85