DEFENSE SYSTEM PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY - AN ETHOLOGICAL APPROACH TO THE PHARMACOLOGY OF FEAR AND ANXIETY

被引:242
|
作者
BLANCHARD, RJ
YUDKO, EB
RODGERS, RJ
BLANCHARD, DC
机构
[1] UNIV HAWAII,DEPT SOCIOL,HONOLULU,HI 96822
[2] UNIV HAWAII,BEKESY LAB NEUROBIOL,HONOLULU,HI 96822
[3] UNIV LEEDS,DEPT PSYCHOL,LEEDS L52 0JT,ENGLAND
[4] UNIV HAWAII,JOHN A BURNS SCH MED,DEPT ANAT & REPROD BIOL,HONOLULU,HI 96822
关键词
DEFENSIVE BEHAVIOR; FEAR; ANXIETY; ANIMAL MODEL; BENZODIAZEPINE; SEROTONIN; IMIPRAMINE; MK-801; SEX DIFFERENCE;
D O I
10.1016/0166-4328(93)90100-5
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Defensive behaviors comprise a set of flexible and adaptive responses to threatening situations and stimuli. In semi-natural situations affording a wide variety of responses, defensive behaviors change over time in response to information about the presence of danger, acquired through risk assessment activities. Two test batteries, a Fear/Defense Test Battery (F/DTB) measuring defensive behaviors to present, approaching predators, and an Anxiety/Defense Test Battery (A/DTB) measuring reactions to potential threat, have been used in conjunction with administration of potentially anxiolytic drugs. Results suggest that the F/DTB behaviors are not systematically responsive to anxiolytics. However, on the A/DTB, anxiolytic benzodiazepines produce a profile of effects primarily involving risk assessment activities. Very similar profiles of effect are seen also with some 5-HT1A compounds, alcohol, imipramine and MK-801, but not for a variety of additional compounds. A consistent pattern of gender differences are obtained with the A/DTB, with females more defensive than males. These results indicate that particular patterns of defensive behaviors may provide a very appropriate animal model for the analysis of pharmacological effects on anxiety.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 165
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] When fear and anxiety derail: The pathology of the human defense system
    Hamm, Alfons O.
    Weike, Almut I.
    Melzig, Christiane A.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGISCHE RUNDSCHAU, 2006, 57 (03) : 154 - 164
  • [2] Keynote Presentation: Use of Psychopharmacology to Reduce Anxiety and Fear in Dogs and Cats: A Practical Approach
    Sherman, Barbara L.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 11TH INTERNATIONAL VETERINARY BEHAVIOUR MEETING, 2017, : 9 - 19
  • [3] Developmental rodent models of fear and anxiety: from neurobiology to pharmacology
    Ganella, Despina E.
    Kim, Jee Hyun
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2014, 171 (20) : 4556 - 4574
  • [4] The defense system of fear: behavior and neurocircuitry
    Misslin, R
    [J]. NEUROPHYSIOLOGIE CLINIQUE-CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2003, 33 (02): : 55 - 66
  • [5] SYSTEM APPROACH IN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY AND MEMORY
    PLEVOVA, J
    [J]. STUDIA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1977, 19 (03) : 261 - 262
  • [6] Overcoming Fear of Flying: A Combined Approach of Psychopharmacology and Gradual Exposure Therapy
    Abuso, Athena Beth V.
    Hashmi, Muneeb
    Hashmi, Hamdaan
    Khoo, Anselm
    Parsaik, Ajay
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (05)
  • [7] Threat and Defense: From Anxiety to Approach
    Jonas, Eva
    McGregor, Ian
    Klackl, Johannes
    Agroskin, Dmitrij
    Fritsche, Immo
    Holbrook, Colin
    Nash, Kyle
    Proulx, Travis
    Quirin, Markus
    [J]. ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 49, 2014, 49 : 219 - 286
  • [8] A QUANTITATIVE ETHOLOGICAL APPROACH TO BEHAVIORAL VARIATION AND TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF MORE SENSITIVE TESTS IN BEHAVIORAL PHARMACOLOGY
    FORKMAN, B
    LJUNGBERG, T
    ENQUIST, M
    UNGERSTEDT, U
    [J]. ACTA PHYSIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1985, 124 : 168 - 168
  • [9] Pathological anxiety and function/dysfunction in the brain's fear/defense circuitry
    Lang, Peter J.
    McTeague, Lisa M.
    Bradley, Margaret M.
    [J]. RESTORATIVE NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 32 (01) : 63 - 77
  • [10] A two-dimensional neuropsychology of defense: fear/anxiety and defensive distance
    McNaughton, N
    Corr, PJ
    [J]. NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2004, 28 (03): : 285 - 305