NATIONALISM - STATE-BUILDING OR STATE-DESTROYING

被引:3
|
作者
MA, SY
机构
[1] University of Toronto, Toronto
来源
SOCIAL SCIENCE JOURNAL | 1992年 / 29卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0362-3319(92)90023-B
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This article examines the question whether nationalism is state-building or state-destorying. To correct a common over-generalization, the article identifies three kinds of states: ideal nation-states, multinational states, and state-nations. The relation between nationalism, defined as loyalty to the nation, and strength of state is then discussed under each of the three contexts. In ideal nation-state, nationalism is unambiguously state-building. In multinational states, whether nationalism is state-building or state-destroying depends on the degree of integration of the nations with the state, which is in turn governed by a set of integrative factors. Finally, in state-nations there is no nation, and thus no nationalism, at the time of state-formation. The heterogenous nature of state-nations often tempts leaders of these states to promote nationalism from above. However, these efforts tend to be state-destroying as they increase the tension between the state and the tribes and or ethnic groups.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 305
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条