Assessment tool for the instructional design of simulation-based team training courses: the ID-SIM

被引:7
|
作者
Fransen, Annemarie F. [1 ,2 ]
van der Hout-van der Jagt, M. Beatrijs [1 ,3 ]
Gardner, Roxane [4 ]
Capelle, Manuela [5 ]
Oei, Sebastiaan P. [6 ]
Heimel, Pieter J. van Runnard [1 ]
Oei, S. Guid [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Maxima Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Run 4600, NL-5500 MB Eindhoven, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Med Ctr, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Eindhoven Univ Technol, Dept Biomed Engn, Eindhoven, Netherlands
[4] Harvard Med Sch, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Ctr Med Simulat, Boston, MA USA
[5] Ziekenhuisgrp Twente, Dept Surg, Almelo, Netherlands
[6] Tergooi Ziekenhuizen, Dept Surg, Hilversum, Netherlands
[7] Eindhoven Univ Technol, Dept Elect Engn, Eindhoven, Netherlands
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1136/bmjstel-2016-000192
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction To achieve an expert performance of care teams, adequate simulation-based team training courses with an effective instructional design are essential. As the importance of the instructional design becomes ever more clear, an objective assessment tool would be valuable for educators and researchers. Therefore, we aimed to develop an evidence-based and objective assessment tool for the evaluation of the instructional design of simulation-based team training courses. Methods A validation study in which we developed an assessment tool containing an evidence-based questionnaire with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and a visual chart directly translating the results of the questionnaire. Psychometric properties of the assessment tool were tested using five descriptions of simulation-based team training courses. An expert-opinion-based ranking from poor to excellent was obtained. Ten independent raters assessed the five training courses twice, by using the developed questionnaire with an interval of 2weeks. Validity and reliability analyses were performed by using the scores from the raters and comparing them with the expert's ranking. Usability was assessed by an 11-item survey. Results A 42-item questionnaire, using VAS, and a propeller chart were developed. The correlation between the expert-opinion-based ranking and the evaluators' scores (Spearman correlation) was 0.95, and the variance due to subjectivity of raters was 3.5% (V-Training*Rater). The G-coefficient was 0.96. The inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)) was 0.91 (95% CI 0.77 to 0.99), and intra-rater reliability for the overall score (ICC) was ranging from 0.91 to 0.99. Conclusions We developed an evidence-based and reliable assessment tool for the evaluation of the instructional design of a simulation-based team training: the ID-SIM. The ID-SIM is available as a free mobile application.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 64
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The use of a stronger instructional design by implementing repetitive practice in simulation-based obstetric team training: trainees' satisfaction
    van Tetering, Anne A. C.
    Fransen, Annemarie F.
    Hout-van der Jagt, M. Bearrijs van der
    Oei, S. Guid
    [J]. BMJ SIMULATION & TECHNOLOGY ENHANCED LEARNING, 2020, 6 (05): : 284 - 288
  • [2] Simulation-Based Education and Team Training
    Shah, Anjan
    Mai, Christine L.
    Shah, Ronak
    Levine, Adam, I
    [J]. OTOLARYNGOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2019, 52 (06) : 995 - +
  • [3] Simulation-Based Interprofessional Team Training
    Brown, Linda L.
    Overly, Frank L.
    [J]. CLINICAL PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 17 (03) : 179 - 184
  • [4] Simulation-Based Team Training in Healthcare
    Eppich, Walter
    Howard, Valerie
    Vozenilek, John
    Curran, Ian
    [J]. SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE, 2011, 6 : S14 - S19
  • [5] Simulation-based team training works
    Brattebo, Guttorm
    Ersdal, Hege Langli
    Wisborg, Torben
    [J]. TIDSSKRIFT FOR DEN NORSKE LAEGEFORENING, 2019, 139 (18) : 1734 - 1736
  • [6] Instructional design affects the efficacy of simulation-based training in central venous catheterization
    Craft, Christopher
    Feldon, David F.
    Brown, Eric A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 207 (05): : 782 - 789
  • [7] Comparison of peer assessment and faculty assessment in an interprofessional simulation-based team training program
    Hegg, Reime Marit
    Ivan, Kvam Fred
    Tone, Johnsgaard
    Morten, Aarflot
    [J]. NURSE EDUCATION IN PRACTICE, 2020, 42
  • [8] Simulation-based team training in the operating room
    Jensen, Lisbet
    Jensen, Anette
    Rasmussen, Dorte Due
    [J]. ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2017, 61 (08) : 1052 - 1053
  • [9] Augmented Intelligence for Instructional Systems in Simulation-Based Training
    van Oijen, Joost
    [J]. ADAPTIVE INSTRUCTIONAL SYSTEMS, AIS 2024, 2024, 14727 : 89 - 101
  • [10] Improvement in student-led debriefing analysis after simulation-based team training using a revised teamwork assessment tool
    Paige, John T.
    Kerdolff, Kathryn E.
    Rogers, Camille L.
    Garbee, Deborah D.
    Yu, Qingzhao
    Cao, Wentao
    Rusnak, Sergeii
    Bonanno, Laura S.
    [J]. SURGERY, 2021, 170 (06) : 1659 - 1664