STIMULUS INTENSITY EFFECT AND RESPONSE LATENCY

被引:0
|
作者
LIU, IM
机构
关键词
D O I
10.4992/psycholres1954.9.166
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
引用
收藏
页码:166 / &
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EFFECT OF STIMULUS INTENSITY ON MOTOR LATENCY IN CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME
    PRESWICK, G
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 1963, 26 (05): : 398 - &
  • [2] LATENCY OF BLINK REFLEX AND STIMULUS INTENSITY
    BIXLER, EO
    BARTLETT, NR
    LANSING, RW
    PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1967, 2 (11): : 559 - 560
  • [3] Effect of stimulus intensity on IRP latency, RT in simple and choice tasks
    Nowik, A.
    Moczko, J.
    Marzec, E.
    PERCEPTION, 2012, 41 : 207 - 207
  • [4] EFFECT OF STIMULUS-DURATION ON LATENCY AT SUBMAXIMAL, MAXIMAL, AND SUPRAMAXIMAL INTENSITY
    PARK, TA
    WERTSCH, JJ
    LOMAS, JN
    MELVIN, JL
    MUSCLE & NERVE, 1990, 13 (09) : 877 - 878
  • [5] Effect of stimulus intensity on LRP latency, RT in simple and choice tasks
    Nowik, A.
    Moczko, J.
    Marzec, E.
    PERCEPTION, 2013, 42 : 68 - 68
  • [6] Estimating stimulus response latency
    Friedman, HS
    Priebe, CE
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 1998, 83 (02) : 185 - 194
  • [7] EFFECT OF STIMULUS-INTENSITY ON SHORT LATENCY SOMATOSENSORY EVOKED-POTENTIALS
    LESSER, RP
    KOEHLE, R
    LUEDERS, H
    ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1979, 47 (03): : 377 - 382
  • [8] EFFECT OF STIMULUS-INTENSITY ON LATENCY AND AMPLITUDE OF TIBIAL EVOKED-POTENTIALS
    KING, PJL
    CHIAPPA, KH
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1988, 18 (03): : 470 - 470
  • [9] Stimulus intensity modifies saccadic reaction time and visual response latency in the superior colliculus
    A. H. Bell
    M. A. Meredith
    A. J. Van Opstal
    D. P. Munoz
    Experimental Brain Research, 2006, 174 : 53 - 59
  • [10] Stimulus intensity modifies saccadic reaction time and visual response latency in the superior colliculus
    Bell, A. H.
    Meredith, M. A.
    Van Opstal, A. J.
    Munoz, D. P.
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2006, 174 (01) : 53 - 59