SHOULD THE FRAMEWORK OF STRUCTURAL VS CIRCULATION MOBILITY BE ABANDONED - IF SO, NOT BECAUSE OF FAULTY LOGIC - COMMENT

被引：4

|

作者：

SLOMCZYNSKI, KM

KRAUZE, T

机构：

[1] UNIV WARSAW, PL-00325 WARSAW, POLAND

[2] HOFSTRA UNIV, HEMPSTEAD, NY 11550 USA

来源：

AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW | 1984年 / 49卷 / 06期

关键词：

D O I：

10.2307/2095535

中图分类号：

C91 [社会学];

学科分类号：

030301 ; 1204 ;

摘要：

引用

收藏

页码：850 / 852

页数：3

相关论文

共 4 条

[1] STRUCTURAL AND CIRCULATION MOBILITY IN THE LINEAR-PROGRAMMING FRAMEWORK - THE CRITICS IN HOT WATER - A REJOINDER TO THE INVITED COMMENT SAVING THE BATH WATER
KRAUZE, TK
SLOMCZYNSKI, KM
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 1986, 14 (03) : 285 - 300
[2] STRUCTURAL AND CIRCULATION MOBILITY ARE ALIVE AND WELL - A CRITICAL COMMENT ON SOBEL PREMATURE OBITUARY NOTICE
JONES, FL
SOCIOLOGY-THE JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH SOCIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, 1985, 19 (01): : 139 - 142
[3] SAVING THE BATH WATER - AN INVITED COMMENT ON KRAUZE AND SLOMCZYNSKI MATRIX REPRESENTATION OF STRUCTURAL AND CIRCULATION MOBILITY
SOBEL, ME
HOUT, M
DUNCAN, OD
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 1986, 14 (03) : 271 - 284
[4] The Inherent Logic and Developmental Tendency of the Practice of Building Socialism with Chinese Characteristics: A Structural Analytical Framework for the Questions of "Where Did China Come From?" and "Where Should China Go?"
Han Qingxiang
Zhang Jian
SOCIAL SCIENCES IN CHINA, 2013, 34 (02) : 5 - 23