A comparison between r-LH and urinary supplements containing LH activity in patients undergoing the microdose GnRH agonist flare protocol for in-vitro fertilization: a pilot study

被引:0
|
作者
Shavit, Tal [1 ]
Agdi, Mohammed [1 ]
Son, Weon-Young [1 ]
Hasson, Josseph [1 ]
Dahan, Michael H. [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Royal Victoria Hosp, McGill Reprod Ctr, 687 Pine Ave West, Montreal, PQ H3A 1A1, Canada
来源
MINERVA GINECOLOGICA | 2016年 / 68卷 / 04期
关键词
recombinant luteinizing hormone; IVF outcomes; human menopausal gonadotropins; multidose flare protocol; diminished ovarian reserve;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare pregnancy rates and stimulation parameters in patients with diminished ovarian reserve, who were treated with recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-LH) or menopausal gonadotropins (hMG), as part of a microdose flare protocol. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed. Comparisons between the group that was stimulated with r-LH plus follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) to those treated with hMG and FSH, were performed. Measurements included: medication doses, number of oocyte collected, number of embryos obtained, pregnancy and clinical pregnancy rates. RESULTS: Patients in the r-LH group (N.=40) had significant higher clinical pregnancy rates (33% vs. 14%; P=0.04) and used lower dose of LH (1938 IU vs. 2807 IU; P=0.02) compared to patients that were stimulated with hMG (N.=39). CONCLUSIONS: r-LH may offer advantages for the treatment of diminished ovarian reserve when performing a microdose flare protocol when compared to hMG. Both larger and prospective studies should be carried out to confirm these findings.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:393 / 399
页数:7
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] Comparing a microdose flare to a GnRH antagonist protocol for poor responder patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization.
    Hollett-Caines, J
    Feyles, V
    Rebel, M
    Power, S
    Tekpetey, F
    Abu-Rafea, B
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2005, 84 : S432 - S432
  • [2] GNRH ANTAGONIST/LETROZOLE VERSUS MICRODOSE GNRH AGONIST FLARE PROTOCOL IN POOR RESPONDERS UNDERGOING IN VITRO FERTILIZATION
    Davar, Robab
    Oskouian, Homa
    Ahmadi, Shahnaz
    Firouzabadi, Razieh Dehghani
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 49 (03): : 297 - 301
  • [3] Microdose gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-A) flare protocol compared with standard long protocol GnRH-A for ovarian stimulation in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization.
    Kelly, SM
    Pirwany, IR
    Phillips, SJ
    Tan, SL
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2002, 78 (03) : S234 - S234
  • [4] MICRODOSE GnRH AGONIST FLARE-UP VERSUS FLEXIBLE GnRH ANTAGONIST PROTOCOL IN POOR RESPONDERS UNDERGOING IN-VITRO-FERTILIZATION (IVF) CYCLES: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL.
    Malhotra, N.
    Singh, N.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2013, 100 (03) : S106 - S106
  • [5] A novel GnRH antagonist protocol based on LH levels versus traditional flexible GnRH antagonist protocol in PCOS patients undergoing in vitro fertilization: study protocol for a randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial
    Liu, Shan
    Lv, Ya-Su
    Han, Shuo
    Liu, Minghui
    Ma, Shuai
    Ren, Haiying
    Li, Yuan
    TRIALS, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [6] A novel GnRH antagonist protocol based on LH levels versus traditional flexible GnRH antagonist protocol in PCOS patients undergoing in vitro fertilization: study protocol for a randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial
    Shan Liu
    Ya-su Lv
    Shuo Han
    Minghui Liu
    Shuai Ma
    Haiying Ren
    Yuan Li
    Trials, 23
  • [7] Comparison of GnRH-Agonist Microdose Flare-up Protocol and Flexible Multiple Dose Antagonistic Protocol in Poor Responder Patients Undergoing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Cycle
    Uludag, Semih
    Kutuk, Mehmet Serdar
    Dolanbay, Mehmet
    Altun, Ozguc
    Ozgun, Mahmut Tuncay
    Aygen, Ercan
    Sahin, Yilmaz
    ERCIYES MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 35 (02) : 52 - 55
  • [8] A comparison of a GnRH antagonist and a long luteal phase agonist protocol for patients with normal ovarian function undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF).
    Jobanputra, KN
    Costa, C
    Gleicher, NG
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2002, 78 (03) : S238 - S238
  • [9] Comparison between hCG and GnRH Agonist for Ovulation Trigger in GnRH Antagonist In-Vitro Fertilization Cycles in a Tertiary Hospital in Malaysia: An observational study
    Aziz, Nor Azimah
    Ibrahim, Adibah
    Ramli, Roziana
    Yaacob, Nasuha
    Rahman, Siti Nabillah Abdul
    Ismail, Engku Husna Engku
    Omar, Ahmad Akram
    JORNAL BRASILEIRO DE REPRODUCAO ASSISTIDA, 2024, 28 (01): : 21 - 26
  • [10] Recombinant human LH supplementation versus supplementation with urinary hCG-based LH activity during controlled ovarian stimulation in the long GnRH-agonist protocol: a matched case-control study
    Buehler, Klaus F.
    Fischer, Robert
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2012, 28 (05) : 345 - 350