Does relationship matter? The choice of financial advisors

被引:14
|
作者
Francis, Bill B. [1 ]
Hasan, Iftekhar [2 ,3 ]
Sun, Xian [4 ]
机构
[1] Rensselaer Polytech Inst, Lally Sch Management & Technol, Troy, NY 12180 USA
[2] Fordham Univ, 5,Columbus Circle,11th Floor, New York, NY 10019 USA
[3] Bank Finland, Helsinki, Finland
[4] Johns Hopkins Univ, Carey Business Sch, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
关键词
Mergers and acquisitions; Financial advisors; Relationship banking; Analyst coverage; Conflict of interests; Proactivea;
D O I
10.1016/j.jeconbus.2013.12.002
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This study evaluates whether and how relationships influence acquirers' choice of financial advisors in mergers and acquisitions(M&As). Specifically, it examines how acquirers' relationships with their advisors, including their optimism of analyst recommendations and the outcome of their past services, determine the choice of advisors in current transaction. Findings suggest that banking relationships have significant yet limited influence on a firm's choice of M&A advisor. The evidence reveals that firms without recent M&A experience are more likely to choose their underwriters as financial advisors in stock-paid deals, especially when they provide overly optimistic analyst coverage prior to the transactions. Firms with recent M&A experience, however, are more likely to switch financial advisors with poor outcomes in past deal(s). (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:22 / 47
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条