Bisphosphonates in osteoporosis: Where do we stand in 2009?

被引:0
|
作者
De Villiers, T. J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stellenbosch, Panorama MediClin, Stellenbosch, South Africa
[2] Univ Stellenbosch, Dept Obstretr & Gynaecol, Stellenbosch, South Africa
关键词
D O I
10.1080/22201009.2009.10872210
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Bisphosphonates were discovered 40 years ago and remain the market leader in the field of osteoporosis. Bisphosphonates are classified as inhibitors of bone resorption and they act by inhibiting the mevalonate pathway to inhibit protein prenylation with resultant inhibition of osteoclastic activity. There are three ethical bisphosphonates as well as generic alendronate that have been approved for the treatment of osteoporosis in South Africa. These drugs offer a wide range of variations in dose, frequency of administration and method of administration. The wide choice in method of administration may lead to improved individual compliance to treatment protocols. There is strong evidence to support antifracture efficacy at vertebral and hip sites in patients treated for up to three years but long-term data as well as prospective data in osteopenic patients are lacking. Gastrointestinal side-effects are common, but can often be avoided by taking medication in the prescribed fashion. The acute phase response to intravenous administration can be prevented by co-administration of oral paracetamol or ibuprofen. Bisphosphonates can cause bone pain. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has accepted evidence that bisphosphonates do not cause atrial fibrillation. Osteonecrosis of the jaw is a rare complication of oral bisphosphonates as used in osteoporosis but may be associated with high dose intravenous treatment in cancer patients. Atypical low energy femur shaft fractures have been associated with long-term usage of the bisphosphonates. A large national observational register-based study reported that these fractures share the same epidemiology and treatment response as classical hip fractures and are best classified as osteoporotic fractures. The cost-effectiveness and treatment options of the bisphosphonates will ensure that they remain significant players in years to come..
引用
收藏
页码:134 / 136
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bisphosphonates for Osteoporosis - Where Do We Go from Here?
    Whitaker, Marcea
    Guo, Jia
    Kehoe, Theresa
    Benson, George
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2012, 366 (22): : 2048 - 2051
  • [2] Back Schools: where do we stand in 2009?
    Genevay, S.
    [J]. SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2009, 139 (7-8) : 4S - 4S
  • [3] Intravenous bisphosphonate therapy for osteoporosis: where do we stand?
    Bone H.G.
    Schurr W.
    [J]. Current Osteoporosis Reports, 2004, 2 (1) : 24 - 30
  • [4] Muscle performance measurement: Where do we stand in 2009?
    Dvir, Z.
    [J]. 6TH EUROPEAN SPORTS MEDICINE CONGRESS (EFSMA), 2009, : 59 - 60
  • [5] Where do we stand?
    Thompson, ID
    [J]. FORESTRY CHRONICLE, 2003, 79 (03): : 381 - 382
  • [6] Where do we stand?
    不详
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 2010, 59 (03) : 79 - 86
  • [7] Where do we stand?
    Catt, Graham
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2008, 86 (07) : N8 - N8
  • [8] WHERE DO WE STAND?
    Stolper, Gustav
    [J]. HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW, 1931, 9 (03) : 289 - 298
  • [9] WHERE DO WE STAND
    MCMILLAN, B
    [J]. IRE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY, 1957, 3 (03): : 173 - 174
  • [10] WHERE DO WE STAND
    不详
    [J]. MILITARY MEDICINE, 1961, 126 (01) : 66 - &