CHARACTERIZATION OF YIELD COMPONENTS IN CERTAIN GROUNDNUT (Arachis hypogaea L.) VARIETIES OF ETHIOPIA

被引:0
|
作者
Jeyaramraja, P. R. [1 ]
Woldesenbet, Fantahun [1 ]
机构
[1] Arba Minch Univ, Coll Nat Sci, Dept Biol, Post Box 21, Arba Minch, Gamo Gofa Zone, Ethiopia
关键词
Yield components; Peanut; Kernel; Pod; Seed; Arachis hypogaea L;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Documentation of yield components (pod and seed characteristics) in the groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) varieties of Ethiopia has not been done so far and the same is not available in the literature. Such literature is required as it forms a platform for further studies in future on plant breeding programmes to improve the traits of this crop in Ethiopia. Hence, a study has been taken up to characterize the pods and seeds in certain important groundnut varieties released by Werer Agricultural Research Centre, Ethiopia. The parameters studied include individual seed weight, number of seeds per pod, 100 pods weight, 100 seeds weight and shelling percent. All the six varieties exhibited statistically significant variations in the studied parameters except shelling percent. Thus, a great extent of genetic diversity is found among the groundnut varieties in Ethiopia. Individual seed weight, 100 pods weight and 100 seeds weight were highest in the variety, Tole 2 while number of seeds per pod was highest in the variety, Werer 964. The parameters analyzed in this investigation were compared with previously available data on days to maturity, oil content and shelled seed yield. Correlation matrix of the studied parameters revealed some interesting relationships among them.
引用
收藏
页码:592 / 596
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Influence of drought at pod-filling stage on yield and yield components of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) varieties of Ethiopia
    Jeyaramraja, P. R.
    Woldesenbet, Fantahun
    [J]. TROPICAL AGRICULTURE, 2016, 93 (04): : 235 - 244
  • [2] ESTIMATION OF HETEROSIS FOR CERTAIN MORPHOLOGICAL, YIELD AND YIELD ATTRIBUTES IN GROUNDNUT (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA L.)
    John, K.
    Reddy, P. Raghava
    Reddy, K. Haripraad
    Sudhakar, P.
    Reddy, N. P. Eswar
    [J]. LEGUME RESEARCH, 2012, 35 (03) : 194 - 201
  • [3] Genotypic differences for reproductive growth, yield, and yield components in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)
    Caliskan, Sevgi
    Caliskan, Mehmet Emin
    Arslan, Mehmet
    [J]. TURKISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY, 2008, 32 (05) : 415 - 424
  • [4] Early generation testing for yield and physiological components in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)
    B.R. Ntare
    [J]. Euphytica, 1999, 107 : 141 - 147
  • [5] Early generation testing for yield and physiological components in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)
    Ntare, BR
    [J]. EUPHYTICA, 1999, 107 (02) : 141 - 147
  • [6] Genetic analysis of pod yield and its components in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)
    Jivani, L. L.
    Khanpara, M. D.
    Vachhani, J. H.
    Kachhadia, V. H.
    [J]. RESEARCH ON CROPS, 2009, 10 (01) : 116 - 118
  • [7] Growth, yield, yield components, and grain qualities of groundnut(Arachis hypogaea L.) as affected by liming and phosphorus rates in southwest Ethiopia
    Getachew Bekele
    Tinsae Birhanu
    Faska Terefe
    [J]. Oil Crop Science, 2023, 8 (03) : 165 - 173
  • [8] Aspergillus and aflatoxin in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) and groundnut cake in Eastern Ethiopia
    Mohammed, Abdi
    Chala, Alemayehu
    Dejene, Mashilla
    Fininsa, Chemeda
    Hoisington, David A.
    Sobolev, Victor S.
    Arias, Renee S.
    [J]. FOOD ADDITIVES & CONTAMINANTS PART B-SURVEILLANCE, 2016, 9 (04): : 290 - 298
  • [9] Impact of earthing up on groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) pod yield and its components
    Desmae, Haile
    Sako, Dramane
    Konate, Djeneba
    [J]. AIMS AGRICULTURE AND FOOD, 2022, 7 (03): : 614 - 622
  • [10] Heterosis Studies in Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) for Pod Yield and its Components Traits
    Nakarani, D. B.
    Dave, P. B.
    Dadheech, Amit
    Makani, A. Y.
    Patel, P. C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PURE AND APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2016, 10 (03): : 2409 - 2415