MEASURING IN-SITU CHANGES IN LABILE SOIL-PHOSPHORUS WITH ANION-EXCHANGE MEMBRANES

被引:119
|
作者
COOPERBAND, LR [1 ]
LOGAN, TJ [1 ]
机构
[1] OHIO STATE UNIV, DEPT AGRON, COLUMBUS, OH 43210 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2136/sssaj1994.03615995005800010015x
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Conventional chemical extraction methods to measure labile soil P are often inadequate for detecting fine temporal- and spatial-scale soil P dynamics in situ. We refined and calibrated methodology for anion-exchange resin-impregnated membranes (AEM), related AEM-P to soil solution P for a high-p-retaining soil, and evaluated the method's viability under humid tropical field conditions. We determined: (i) AEM recyclability, (ii) AEM P sorption kinetics, (iii) the correlation between soil solution P and AEM-P for an Andic Humitropept, and (iv) potential interference from other anions (NO3- and SO42-) on AEM P extraction. We used AEMs in a field decomposition study to evaluate plant residue and manure P release characteristics and concurrent fluxes in labile soil P. The AEM P sorption capacity was not altered significantly by repeated use. Nitrate solution concentrations in an aqueous medium of 50 and 100 mg NO3-N/L reduced AEM P sorption by 50 and 75%, respectively, regardless of P solution concentration; SO4-S at 500 and 1000 mg/L reduced AEM P sorption by almost-equal-to 98%. The relationship between AEM-P and soil solution P was curvilinear at both nonequilibrium and equilibrium soil solution P concentrations; it was essentially linear at soil solution concentrations ranging from 0 to 2 mg P/L. The AEM behaved as a dynamic exchanger rather than an infinite sink for P, particularly in the context of a low-pH, high-P-retaining soil. The AEMs detected biologically relevant soil P pulses in the field decomposition study. The technique holds promise as an easy method for measuring soil P fluxes with minimal soil disturbance.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 114
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Interaction of Phosphorus Compounds with Anion-Exchange Membranes: Implications for Soil Analysis
    Cheesman, Alexander W.
    Turner, Benjamin L.
    Reddy, K. Ramesh
    [J]. SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2010, 74 (05) : 1607 - 1612
  • [2] Measuring the alkaline stability of anion-exchange membranes
    Haj-Bsoul, Saja
    Varcoe, John R.
    Dekel, Dario R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ELECTROANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2022, 908
  • [3] Method of labile sulphur determination using anion-exchange membranes
    Uchôa, SCP
    Alvarez, VH
    Freire, FM
    Schaefer, CEGR
    Hartmann, LK
    [J]. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIA DO SOLO, 2003, 27 (01): : 89 - 99
  • [4] DETERMINATION OF LABILE AND RELEASABLE FORMS OF SOIL-PHOSPHORUS
    MACHACEK, V
    [J]. ROSTLINNA VYROBA, 1994, 40 (10): : 889 - 898
  • [5] In-situ electrochemical degradation of anion exchange membranes
    Mendoza, Alfonso J.
    Tighe, Tim B.
    Chen, Guang
    Wang, Lizhu
    Hickner, Michael A.
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2011, 242
  • [6] LABILE, ORGANIC PHOSPHORUS IN INCUBATED SOILS ESTIMATED BY MACROPOROUS ANION-EXCHANGE RESIN
    SIBBESEN, E
    RUBAEK, GH
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 1994, 25 (9-10) : 1671 - 1683
  • [7] MICROHETEROGENEITY OF ANION-EXCHANGE MEMBRANES
    MIZUTANI, Y
    KUSUMOTO, K
    NISHIMURA, M
    NISHIMURA, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE, 1975, 19 (09) : 2537 - 2543
  • [8] COMPARISON OF SOIL NITRATE EXTRACTED BY POTASSIUM-CHLORIDE AND ADSORBED ON AN ANION-EXCHANGE MEMBRANE IN-SITU
    PARE, T
    GREGORICH, EG
    ELLERT, BH
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 1995, 26 (5-6) : 883 - 898
  • [9] MEASUREMENT OF SOIL MICROBIAL BIOMASS PHOSPHORUS BY AN ANION-EXCHANGE MEMBRANE METHOD
    KOUNO, K
    TUCHIYA, Y
    ANDO, T
    [J]. SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 1995, 27 (10): : 1353 - 1357
  • [10] ANION-EXCHANGE MEMBRANES USED TO ASSESS MANAGEMENT IMPACTS ON SOIL NITRATE
    WANDER, MM
    MCCRACKEN, DV
    SHUMAN, LM
    JOHNSON, JW
    BOX, JE
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 1995, 26 (15-16) : 2383 - 2390