Perceptual Priming and Structural Choice in Russian Sentence Production

被引:0
|
作者
Myachykov, Andriy [1 ]
Tomlin, Russell [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Dept Psychol, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
关键词
word order; syntax; attention; Russian;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
We report the results of a study that used perceptual priming paradigm to investigate how attentional focus on a referent influences structural choice in Russian sentence production. Experimental hypotheses were based on two previously reported findings. First, some sentence production studies using English demonstrated that perceptually priming a referent of a visual event improves its chances of assignment as the Subject of a sentence about this event and triggers the resulting choice between active and passive voice (Gleitman, et al., 2007; Tomlin, 1995, 1997). Second, a study by Ferreira (1996) showed that English speakers alternate between the structures easier and faster when they have a wider battery of structural alternatives available to them. Our data confirmed both findings with important detalization. First, Russian speakers were more likely to assign the sentential starting point but not the Subject to the perceptually primed referent alternating between the agent-initial and the patient-initial structural alternatives. This finding suggests that perceptual priming leads to the positional but not the preferential assignment of grammatical roles in Russian. Second, Russian speakers having a seemingly wider inventory of structural options than their English counterparts were more reluctant to alternate structure as a function of the perceptual prime. This tendency may result form the necessity to maintain early commitments to the case-marked noun forms, which effectively binds structural selection to a much smaller number of available alternatives than the normative grammar of Russian suggests.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 48
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of Visual Priming and Event Orientation on Word Order Choice in Russian Sentence Production
    Pokhoday, Mikhail
    Shtyrov, Yury
    Myachykov, Andriy
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 10
  • [2] Effects of structural priming on sentence production in aphasics
    Saffran, EM
    Martin, N
    [J]. LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES, 1997, 12 (5-6): : 877 - 882
  • [3] Structural priming as implicit learning: A comparison of models of sentence production
    Chang, F
    Dell, GS
    Bock, K
    Griffin, ZM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLINGUISTIC RESEARCH, 2000, 29 (02) : 217 - 229
  • [4] Structural Priming as Implicit Learning: A Comparison of Models of Sentence Production
    Franklin Chang
    Gary S. Dell
    Kathryn Bock
    Zenzi M. Griffin
    [J]. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2000, 29 : 217 - 230
  • [5] Determinants of structural choice in visually situated sentence production
    Myachykov, Andriy
    Garrod, Simon
    Scheepers, Christoph
    [J]. ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2012, 141 (03) : 304 - 315
  • [6] Structural priming in sentence comprehension
    Harrington, M
    Dennis, S
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-FIFTH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE COGNITIVE SCIENCE SOCIETY, PTS 1 AND 2, 2003, : 510 - 515
  • [7] Visual Attention and Structural Choice in Sentence Production Across Languages
    Myachykov, Andriy
    Thompson, Dominic
    Scheepers, Christoph
    Garrod, Simon
    [J]. LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTICS COMPASS, 2011, 5 (02): : 95 - 107
  • [8] Syntactic priming in German sentence production
    Scheepers, C
    Corley, M
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-SECOND ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE COGNITIVE SCIENCE SOCIETY, 2000, : 435 - 440
  • [9] Priming word order in sentence production
    Hartsuiker, R
    Huiskamp, P
    Westenberg, G
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NINETEENTH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE COGNITIVE SCIENCE SOCIETY, 1997, : 947 - 947
  • [10] Priming word order in sentence production
    Hartsuiker, RJ
    Kolk, HHJ
    Huiskamp, P
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 52 (01): : 129 - 147