Institutional investors and shareholder class actions: The law and economics of participation

被引:0
|
作者
Legg, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Supreme Court New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
来源
AUSTRALIAN LAW JOURNAL | 2007年 / 81卷 / 07期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
This article examines the role of institutional investors in Australian shareholder class actions by drawing on US experience since the enactment of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 which sought to encourage institutional investors to take the lead in US class actions. The article argues that whether institutional investors will participate in a class action will depend upon the potential recovery and costs involved. The costs include direct costs such as legal fees, as well as indirect costs such as management time. However, those costs can be ameliorated through litigation funding or through the role taken in the class action, namely representative party, a group member or a free-rider (an absent member of the class who only comes forward to collect a recovery). The article concludes that, as in the US, it is economic incentives which will determine the role that institutional investors play in shareholder class actions.
引用
收藏
页码:478 / 490
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The law and economics of class actions
    Backhaus, Juergen
    Cassone, Alberto
    Ramello, Giovanni B.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF LAW AND ECONOMICS, 2011, 32 (02) : 165 - 168
  • [2] The law and economics of class actions
    Juergen Backhaus
    Alberto Cassone
    Giovanni B. Ramello
    [J]. European Journal of Law and Economics, 2011, 32 : 165 - 168
  • [3] Institutional investors and shareholder litigation
    Barabanov, Sergey S.
    Ozocak, Onem
    Turtle, H. J.
    Walker, Thomas J.
    [J]. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2008, 37 (02) : 227 - 250
  • [4] Institutional investors, shareholder activism, and earnings management
    Hadani, Michael
    Goranova, Maria
    Khan, Raihan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2011, 64 (12) : 1352 - 1360
  • [5] Shareholder activism by institutional investors: Evidence from CalPERS
    Smith, MP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1996, 51 (01): : 227 - 252
  • [6] Legal reform and shareholder activism by institutional investors in Japan
    Seki, T
    [J]. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW, 2005, 13 (03) : 377 - 385
  • [7] The essence of economics Law, participation and institutional choice (two ways)
    Komesar, Neil
    [J]. ALTERNATIVE INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURES: EVOLUTION AND IMPACT, 2008, : 165 - 186
  • [8] Shareholder class actions: Are they good for shareholders?
    Miller, Paul
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN LAW JOURNAL, 2012, 86 (09):
  • [9] Shareholder voting in China: The role of large shareholders and institutional investors
    Song, Shunlin
    Xu, Xin
    Yi, Yang
    [J]. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW, 2020, 28 (01) : 69 - 87
  • [10] Corporate governance proposals and shareholder activism: the role of institutional investors
    Gillan, SL
    Starks, LT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2000, 57 (02) : 275 - 305