ECONOMIC INSTRUMENTS FOR REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSION IN AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY

被引:1
|
作者
Pesic, Radmilo [1 ]
Ivanis, Marko [2 ]
Prodanovic, Radivoj [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Belgrade, Fac Agr, Nemanjina 6, Zemun 11080, Serbia
[2] Univ Business Acad Novi Sad, Fac Econ & Engn Management Novi Sad, Cvecarska St 2, Novi Sad 21000, Serbia
来源
关键词
economic instruments; air; gasses; greenhouse; agriculture;
D O I
10.5937/ekoPolj1801269P
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
A significant reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in agriculture and forestry can be achieved with adequate economic instruments. There are also other measures on disposal, such as good agricultural practice and organic production that involve the use of agronomic and biotechnological knowledge and skills with the purpose to produce healthy and safe food, with the preserving the environment and production resources. In the paper we analyze the previous experience in the application of economic instruments for the reduction of greenhouse effect in Agriculture and Forestry, in the broad and narrow sense, both in the domestic and international context. Special attention is given to the experiences in the implementation of the so-called flexibility mechanisms under the Kyoto Protocol. As a result of these experiences, in the period after 2012, new instruments have been created, mainly on a voluntary basis, which does not inspire confidence in their effectiveness. It has been noted that the system of economic instruments for the promotion of agricultural production in Serbia is in contradiction with the objectives of the climate protection policy. Changes are proposed in terms of abolishing direct benefits per hectare and the livestock units, as well as introduction of incentives for energy efficiency, renewable energy sources, and specifically for the organic production. Punitive measures must, once and for all, stop the harmful and dangerous practice of burning crop residues on fields.
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 291
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Agriculture, Forestry, Land Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions
    Legg, Wilfrid
    Davis, John
    [J]. EUROCHOICES, 2015, 14 (02) : 24 - +
  • [2] Climate change - Greenhouse gas mitigation in US agriculture and forestry
    McCarl, BA
    Schneider, UA
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2001, 294 (5551) : 2481 - 2482
  • [3] African greenhouse gas emission inventories and mitigation options: Forestry, land-use change, and agriculture
    Braatz, BV
    Brown, S
    Isichei, AO
    Odada, EO
    Scholes, RJ
    Sokona, Y
    Drichi, P
    Gaston, G
    Delmas, R
    Holmes, R
    Amous, S
    Muyungi, RS
    DeJode, A
    Gibbs, M
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 1995, 38 (2-3) : 109 - 126
  • [4] Greenhouse gas emission reduction effect in the transportation sector by urban agriculture in Seoul, Korea
    Lee, Gwan-Gyu
    Lee, Hyun-Woo
    Lee, Jung-Hwan
    [J]. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2015, 140 : 1 - 7
  • [5] Agricultural sector analysis on greenhouse gas mitigation in US agriculture and forestry
    Schneider, Uwe A.
    McCarl, Bruce A.
    Schmid, Erwin
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2007, 94 (02) : 128 - 140
  • [6] Prioritizing greenhouse gas emission mitigation measures for agriculture
    Kulshreshtha, SN
    Junkins, B
    Desjardins, R
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2000, 66 (03) : 145 - 166
  • [7] AGRICULTURE AND GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSION - RESULTS OF ECONOMETRIC ANALYSIS
    Krstic, Milos
    [J]. EKONOMIKA POLJOPRIVREDA-ECONOMICS OF AGRICULTURE, 2024, 71 (02): : 427 - 441
  • [8] Greenhouse gas emission reduction in public buildings according to greenhouse gas reduction policies in Daegu
    KIM Hyo-kyung
    YEO Myung-kil
    JEON Gyu-yeob
    HONG Won-hwa
    KIM Kwang-woo
    [J]. Journal of Chongqing University(English Edition), 2012, 11 (01) : 36 - 43
  • [9] Comparative analysis of greenhouse gas emission inventory for Pakistan: Part II agriculture, forestry and other land use and waste
    Mir, Kaleem Anwar
    Park, Chunkyoo
    Purohit, Pallav
    Kim, Seungdo
    [J]. ADVANCES IN CLIMATE CHANGE RESEARCH, 2021, 12 (01) : 132 - 144
  • [10] The potential contribution of the agriculture and forestry sectors to greenhouse gas management: A policy perspective
    Thomassin, PJ
    Atkinson, P
    van Kooten, GC
    Weersink, A
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D AGROECONOMIE, 2005, 53 (04): : 271 - 273