Assessing Online Collaborative Discourse

被引:9
|
作者
Breen, Henny [1 ]
机构
[1] Linfield Coll, Good Samaritan Sch Nursing, Portland, OR 97210 USA
关键词
Nursing education; online education; transcript analysis; collaborative learning;
D O I
10.1111/nuf.12091
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
PURPOSE. This qualitative study using transcript analysis was undertaken to clarify the value of Harasim's Online Collaborative Learning Theory as a way to assess the collaborative process within nursing education. The theory incorporated three phases: (a) idea generating; (b) idea organizing; and (c) intellectual convergence. METHOD. The transcripts of asynchronous discussions from a 2-week module about disaster nursing using a virtual community were analyzed and formed the data for this study. FINDINGS. This study supports the use of Online Collaborative Learning Theory as a framework for assessing online collaborative discourse. Individual or group outcomes were required for the students to move through all three phases of the theory. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION. The phases of the Online Collaborative Learning Theory could be used to evaluate the student's ability to collaborate. It is recommended that group process skills, which have more to do with interpersonal skills, be evaluated separately from collaborative learning, which has more to do with cognitive skills. Both are required for practicing nurses. When evaluated separately, the student learning needs are more clearly delineated.
引用
收藏
页码:218 / 227
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Analysis of engaged online collaborative discourse: A methodological approach
    Malheiro, Sofia
    Morgado, Lina
    Quintas-Mendes, Antonio
    [J]. COMPUTERS AND EDUCATION: TOWARDS EDUCATIONAL CHANGE AND INNOVATION, 2008, : 33 - 43
  • [2] A tool for assessing collaborative learning - at school and online
    Romano, Luigi
    [J]. 2014 14TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES (ICALT), 2014, : 310 - 314
  • [3] Assessing and Scaffolding Collaborative Learning in Online Discussions
    Shaw, Erin
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN EDUCATION: SUPPORTING LEARNING THROUGH INTELLIGENT AND SOCIALLY INFORMED TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 125 : 587 - 594
  • [4] Assessing online collaborative learning: process and product
    Macdonald, J
    [J]. COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2003, 40 (04) : 377 - 391
  • [5] Assessing a Collaborative Online Environment for Music Composition
    Biasutti, Michele
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY & SOCIETY, 2015, 18 (03): : 49 - 63
  • [6] Discourse patterns during children's collaborative online discussions
    Kim, Il-Hee
    Anderson, Richard C.
    Nguyen-Jahiel, Kim
    Archodidou, Anthi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE LEARNING SCIENCES, 2007, 16 (03) : 333 - 370
  • [7] Collaborative argumentation and justifications: A statistical discourse analysis of online discussions
    Lu, Jingyan
    Chiu, Ming Ming
    Law, Nancy WaiYing
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2011, 27 (02) : 946 - 955
  • [8] Socioemotional Discourse and Shared Knowledge Construction in Online Collaborative Tasks
    Carlos Castellanos-Ramirez, Juan
    Alheli Nino-Carrasco, Shamaly
    Lariza Parra-Encinas, Karla
    [J]. REVISTA ELECTRONICA EDUCARE, 2020, 24 (02):
  • [9] Patterns of discourse in online interaction: seeking evidence of the collaborative learning process
    Nor, Nor Fariza Mohd
    Hamat, Afendi
    Embi, Mohamed Amin
    [J]. COMPUTER ASSISTED LANGUAGE LEARNING, 2012, 25 (03) : 237 - 256
  • [10] THE USE OF ONLINE COLLABORATIVE DISCOURSE TO SUPPORT IN-SERVICE TEACHER TRAINING
    Allaire, Stephane
    Hamel, Christine
    [J]. MCGILL JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, 2009, 44 (03): : 467 - 487