Under what conditions, if any, do those the law addresses have a moral duty or obligation to obey it simply because it is the law? In this essay, I identify five general approaches to carrying out this task, and offer a somewhat detailed discussion of one or two examples of each approach. The approaches studied are: relational-role approaches that appeal to the fact that an agent occupies the role of member in the political community; attempts to ground the duty to obey the law in individual consent or fair play; natural duty approaches; instrumental approaches; and philosophical anarchism, an approach that denies that most subjects of contemporary states have a duty to obey the law simply in virtue of its status as such.
机构:
COLL WILLIAM & MARY,MARSHALL WYTHE SCH LAW,INST BILL RIGHTS LAW,WILLIAMSBURG,VA 23185COLL WILLIAM & MARY,MARSHALL WYTHE SCH LAW,INST BILL RIGHTS LAW,WILLIAMSBURG,VA 23185