Test Equating Under the NEAT Design: A Necessary Condition for Anchor Items

被引:1
|
作者
Raykov, Tenko [1 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Measurement & Quantitat Methods, 443A Erickson Hall, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/15366361003684687
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Mroch, Suh, Kane, & Ripkey (2009); Suh, Mroch, Kane, & Ripkey (2009); and Kane, Mroch, Suh, & Ripkey (2009) provided elucidating discussions on critical properties of linear equating methods under the nonequivalent groups with anchor test (NEAT) design. In this popular equating design, two test forms are administered to different groups of examinees and an anchor subtest consisting of several items is part of the two forms. This subtest, often referred to as anchor test, comprises the same items that are used in the two groups and is typically utilized subsequently to link the resulting scores on the two forms. This note is concerned with what may well be viewed as a necessary condition for an application of the NEAT design. This condition seems not to have received the attention it deserves in much of the literature on test equating. The condition is the so-called measurement invariance (e.g., Meredith, 1993; Meredith & Horn, 2001; Muthén & Muthén, 2008) with regard to the items comprising the anchor test. Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 20
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Investigating the Impact of Compromised Anchor Items on IRT Equating Under the Nonequivalent Anchor Test Design
    Jurich, Daniel P.
    DeMars, Christine E.
    Goodman, Joshua T.
    [J]. APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2012, 36 (04) : 291 - 308
  • [2] An Alternative View on the NEAT Design in Test Equating
    Gonzalez, Jorge
    San Martin, Ernesto
    [J]. QUANTITATIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 233 : 111 - 120
  • [3] The Research on Anchor Ratio of Test Equating Design
    Xiong, Jianhua
    Ye, XinRong
    Ding, Shuliang
    Luo, Fen
    [J]. ICFCSE 2011: 2011 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUTURE COMPUTER SUPPORTED EDUCATION, VOL 1, 2011, : 338 - 341
  • [4] Who Needs Linear Equating Under the NEAT Design?
    Maris, Gunter
    Schmittmann, Verena D.
    Borsboom, Denny
    [J]. MEASUREMENT-INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH AND PERSPECTIVES, 2010, 8 (01) : 11 - 15
  • [5] The Missing Data Assumptions of the NEAT Design and their Implications for Test Equating
    Sinharay, Sandip
    Holland, Paul W.
    [J]. PSYCHOMETRIKA, 2010, 75 (02) : 309 - 327
  • [6] Practical Considerations in Choosing an Anchor Test Form for Equating Under the Random Groups Design
    Cui, Zhongmin
    He, Yong
    [J]. MEASUREMENT-INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH AND PERSPECTIVES, 2023, 21 (02) : 101 - 113
  • [7] The Missing Data Assumptions of the NEAT Design and their Implications for Test Equating
    Sandip Sinharay
    Paul W. Holland
    [J]. Psychometrika, 2010, 75 : 309 - 327
  • [8] Outlier Detection Using t-test in Rasch IRT Equating under NEAT Design
    Liu, Chunyan
    Jurich, Daniel
    [J]. APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2022, : 34 - 47
  • [9] Comparison of several small sample equating methods under the NEAT design
    Caglak, Serdar
    [J]. TURKISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, 2016, 5 (03): : 96 - +
  • [10] Empirical Ensemble Equating Under the NEAT Design Inspired by Machine Learning Ideology
    Jiang, Zhehan
    Han, Yuting
    Zhang, Jihong
    Xu, Lingling
    Shi, Dexin
    Liang, Haiying
    Ouyang, Jinying
    [J]. METHODOLOGY-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RESEARCH METHODS FOR THE BEHAVIORAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2023, 19 (02) : 116 - 132