ANALYZING SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE IN DOCUMENTS: THE CASE OF REGULATORY IMPACT ASSESSMENT

被引:3
|
作者
Staronova, Katarina [1 ]
机构
[1] Comenius Univ, Inst Publ Policy & Econ, Fac Social & Econ Sci, Mlynske Luhy 4, Bratislava 82105, Slovakia
关键词
evidence-based policy making; regulatory impact assessment; institutionalization; document analysis; scientific knowledge;
D O I
10.2478/s13374-014-0228-7
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Regulatory impact assessment (RIA) is seen as a tool for increasing evidence-based policy making and as such it is being integrated into decision-making procedures on a wide range of issues. Based on systematic consultation, clear criteria for policy choice, and economic analysis of how costs and benefits impact on a wide range of affected parties, this tool operates by using scientific knowledge and technical analysis rather than political considerations. Scientific knowledge can be used to achieve instrumental learning (Radaelli, 2009, OECD), policy change (Sabatier, 1999), to impact on decision making (Caplan, 1979; C.H. Weiss, 1999) but also to seek legitimacy from the policy environment (Edelman, 1985; Schrefler, 2010). This article suggests an analytical framework for analysing RIA documents with insight from knowledge utilization theories. We argue that in order to better understand the RIA itself, we need to look at institutional factors as well. The combination of institutional context variables and variables for RIA document content analysis which make up worldviews in this framework provide the basis for the document analysis and exploration of RIA in its context.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 306
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] New trends in scientific knowledge graphs and research impact assessment
    Manghi, Paolo
    Mannocci, Andrea
    Osborne, Francesco
    Sacharidis, Dimitris
    Salatino, Angelo
    Vergoulis, Thanasis
    [J]. QUANTITATIVE SCIENCE STUDIES, 2022, 2 (04): : 1296 - 1300
  • [2] Certain problems of scientific and technical translation of regulatory documents
    Kolbasin, O.
    Maslova, N.
    [J]. UKRAINIAN METROLOGICAL JOURNAL, 2019, (02): : 30 - 39
  • [3] The production and use of knowledge in regulatory impact assessment - An empirical analysis
    Hertin, Julia
    Jacob, Klaus
    Pesch, Udo
    Pacchi, Carolina
    [J]. FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2009, 11 (5-6) : 413 - 421
  • [4] The Impact of Scientific Knowledge Resources on Innovation Performance: A Case Study
    Zhou, Juxiang
    Chen, Jin
    Zhao, Xiaoting
    Yu, Xiangzhen
    Yin, Yue
    [J]. 2013 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT (IEEM 2013), 2013, : 1500 - 1504
  • [5] Analyzing linguistic complexity and scientific impact
    Lu, Chao
    Bu, Yi
    Dong, Xianlei
    Wang, Jie
    Ding, Ying
    Lariviere, Vincent
    Sugimoto, Cassidy R.
    Paul, Logan
    Zhang, Chengzhi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2019, 13 (03) : 817 - 829
  • [6] Implementing regulatory innovations in Europe: the case of impact assessment
    De Francesco, Fabrizio
    Radaelli, Claudio M.
    Troeger, Vera E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC POLICY, 2012, 19 (04) : 491 - 511
  • [7] Extraction and Evaluation of Knowledge Entities from Scientific Documents
    Chengzhi Zhang
    Philipp Mayr
    Wei Lu
    Yi Zhang
    [J]. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2021, (03) : 1 - 5
  • [8] Extraction and Evaluation of Knowledge Entities from Scientific Documents
    Zhang, Chengzhi
    Mayr, Philipp
    Lu, Wei
    Zhang, Yi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DATA AND INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2021, 6 (03) : 1 - 5
  • [9] Extraction and Evaluation of Knowledge Entities from Scientific Documents
    Chengzhi Zhang
    Philipp Mayr
    Wei Lu
    Yi Zhang
    [J]. JournalofDataandInformationScience, 2021, 6 (03) : 1 - 5
  • [10] Enhancing the Clinical Professional's Knowledge of Regulatory Documents
    Bowen, Sherri
    [J]. DRUG INFORMATION JOURNAL, 2011, 45 (02): : 151 - 154