COMPARISON OF THE WAIS AND THE WAIS-R IN THE UPPER RANGES OF IQ

被引：0

作者：

MITCHELL, RE

GRANDY, TG

LUPO, JV

机构：

[1] CREIGHTON UNIV,DEPT PSYCHOL,PSYCHOL SERV,OMAHA,NE 68178

[2] CREIGHTON UNIV,COUNSELING SERV,OMAHA,NE 68178

来源：

PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-RESEARCH AND PRACTICE | 1986年 / 17卷 / 01期

关键词：

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

B84 [心理学];

学科分类号：

04 ; 0402 ;

摘要：

引用

页码：82 / 83

页数：2

共 50 条

[1] COMPARISON OF THE WAIS AND WAIS-R - DIFFERENT RESULTS FOR DIFFERENT IQ GROUPS
SPRUILL, J
BECK, BL
[J]. PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 1988, 19 (01) : 31 - 34
[2] A COMPARISON OF THE SHIPLEY VS WAIS-R SUBTESTS IN PREDICTING WAIS-R FULL SCALE IQ
DALTON, JE
PEDERSON, SL
MCENTYRE, WL
[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1987, 43 (02) : 278 - 280
[3] AN INDEX OF PREMORBID IQ FOR THE 1981 REVISION OF THE WAIS (WAIS-R)
REYNOLDS, CR
BARONA, A
[J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1984, 6 (01): : 90 - 90
[4] A COMPARISON OF THE WAIS AND WAIS-R IN MATCHED UK SAMPLES
CRAWFORD, JR
ALLAN, KM
BESSON, JAO
COCHRANE, RHB
STEWART, LE
[J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 29 : 105 - 109
[5] CROSS-RACIAL COMPARISON OF THE WAIS AND WAIS-R
WHITWORTH, RH
GIBBONS, RT
[J]. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1986, 46 (04) : 1041 - 1049
[6] COMPARISON OF 2 METHODS FOR CONVERTING THE WAIS TO THE WAIS-R
RUSSELL, EW
[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 48 (03) : 355 - 359
[7] COMPARISON OF THE WAIS AND THE WAIS-R WITH SS OF HIGH INTELLIGENCE
EDWARDS, BT
KLEIN, M
[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1984, 40 (01) : 300 - 302
[8] ESTIMATED PREMORBID WAIS-R IQ PROGRAM
PAOLO, T
[J]. CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 1989, 9 (02) : R3 - R4
[9] COMPARISON OF WAIS AND WAIS-R FACTOR STRUCTURE FOR NEUROPSYCHIATRIC PATIENTS
WARNER, MH
ERNST, J
TOWNES, BD
[J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1986, 59 (02) : 715 - 720
[10] A comparison of WAIS-R and WAIS-III in the lower IQ range: Implications for learning disability diagnosis
Fitzgerald, Suzanne
Gray, Nicola S.
Snowden, Robert J.
[J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2007, 20 (04) : 323 - 330

← 1 2 3 4 5 →