INTERINSTITUTIONAL AGREEMENT OF INDIVIDUAL FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE MEASURE (FIM) ITEMS MEASURED AT 2 SITES ON ONE SAMPLE OF SCI PATIENTS

被引:57
|
作者
SEGAL, ME
DITUNNO, JF
STAAS, WE
机构
[1] Regional Spinal Cord Injury Center of Delaware Valley, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, 132 South 10th St
来源
PARAPLEGIA | 1993年 / 31卷 / 10期
关键词
SPINAL CORD INJURY; FIM RELIABILITY; FIM INTERINSTITUTIONAL AGREEMENT;
D O I
10.1038/sc.1993.101
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Individual items of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) were analyzed for interinstitutional agreement using a sample of 57 spinal cord injured (SCI) patients at discharge from an acute care rehabilitation setting (ACRS) and at admission to an ongoing rehabilitation setting (ORS). The two FIM ratings were performed within 6 days of each other. The reliability coefficient for total FIM scores was good: 0.83. Individual items were classified into four groups: (1) above average reliability coefficient, above average proportion agreement, which included the feeding items and items from the mobility category; (2) above average reliability coefficient, below average agreement, which included the majority of items in the selfcare category; (3) below average reliability coefficient, above average agreement, which included items in the sphincter control and communication categories; and (4) below average reliability coefficient, below average agreement, which included items in the social cognition category. Patients received significantly higher ratings on most selfcare items in the ACRS, and significantly higher ratings on social cognition items in the ORS. Implications of these results are discussed in terms of using individual FIM items for research purposes. Reliability coefficients were acceptably high for subgroups of complete and incomplete paraplegics and for complete quadriplegics, ranging from 0.74 to 0.87, but low for incomplete quadriplegics, r = 0.49. However, these sample sizes were small, ranging from 9 to 17 patients. Data collection will continue in order to increase sample size and permit further analysis of these subgroups.
引用
收藏
页码:622 / 631
页数:10
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] Usefulness of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM), its subscales and individual items as outcome measures in Guillain Barre syndrome
    Prasad, R
    Hellawell, DJ
    Pentland, B
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH, 2001, 24 (01) : 59 - 64
  • [2] THE DISABILITY STATUS OF INJURED PATIENTS MEASURED BY THE FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE MEASURE (FIM) AND THEIR USE OF REHABILITATION SERVICES
    HETHERINGTON, H
    EARLAM, RJ
    KIRK, CJC
    [J]. INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 1995, 26 (02): : 97 - 101
  • [3] Agreement of functional independence measure item scores in patients transferred from one rehabilitation setting to another
    Kohler, F.
    Dickson, H.
    Redmond, H.
    Estell, J.
    Connolly, C.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2009, 45 (04) : 479 - 485
  • [4] Interrater Agreement of Functional Independence Measure Aggregate Scores in a Clinical Setting of Patients Transferred from One Rehabilitation Unit to in Raters Advised of the Study Beforehand
    Kohler, Friedbert
    Redmond, Helen
    Dickson, Hugh
    Estell, John
    Connolly, Carol
    Renton, Roger
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH, 2009, 32 : S29 - S29