POPULATION VIABILITY ANALYSIS AS A TOOL IN WILDLIFE CONSERVATION POLICY - WITH REFERENCE TO AUSTRALIA

被引:76
|
作者
LINDENMAYER, DB
CLARK, TW
LACY, RC
THOMAS, VC
机构
[1] NO ROCKIES CONSERVAT COOPERAT,JACKSON,WY 83001
[2] DEPT CONSERVAT & ENVIRONM,DIV FLORA & FAUNA,WILDLIFE BRANCH,HEIDELBERG,VIC 3084,AUSTRALIA
[3] CHICAGO ZOOL SOC,DEPT CONSERVAT BIOL,BROOKFIELD,IL 60513
关键词
POPULATION VIABILITY ANALYSIS; WILDLIFE CONSERVATION AND POLICY; SMALL POPULATIONS; AUSTRALIA;
D O I
10.1007/BF02393895
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Wildlife conservation policy for endangered species restoration follows a six-phase process. Population viability analysis (PVA) can play a major contributing role in four of these. PVA, as discussed here, is a technique where extinction vulnerabilities of small populations are estimated using computer simulation modeling. The benefits and limitations of using PVA in wildlife decision and policy processes are reviewed based on our direct experience. PVA permits decision makers to set time frames for management, estimate the required magnitude of restoration efforts, identify quantitative targets for species recovery, and select, implement, monitor, and evaluate management strategies. PVA is of greatest value for rare species policy and management. However, a limitation of PVA simulation models is that they are constrained by the amount of biological data available, and such data are difficult to obtain from small populations that are at immediate risk of extinction. These problems may be overcome with improved models and more data. Our experience shows benefits of PVA far outweigh its limitations, and applications of the approach are most useful when integrated with decision analysis and completed within an adaptive management philosophy. PVAs have been carried out for 14 Victorian species and less used elsewhere in Australia. Management and recovery plans are developed from these PVAs. We recommend that PVA be used to guide research programs, develop conservation strategies, and inform decision and policy making for both endangered and nonendangered species because it can significantly improve many aspects of natural resource policy and management.
引用
收藏
页码:745 / 758
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Population viability analysis as a tool for giant anteater conservation
    Jean Desbiez, Arnaud Leonard
    Bertassoni, Alessandra
    Traylor-Holzer, Kathy
    PERSPECTIVES IN ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2020, 18 (02) : 124 - 131
  • [2] WILDLIFE POPULATION VIABILITY - A QUESTION OF RISK
    SALWASSER, H
    MEALEY, SP
    JOHNSON, K
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN WILDLIFE AND NATURAL RESOURCES CONFERENCE, 1984, 49 : 421 - 439
  • [3] Wildlife Tunnel Enhances Population Viability
    van der Ree, Rodney
    Heinze, Dean
    McCarthy, Michael
    Mansergh, Ian
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2009, 14 (02):
  • [4] Predictive accuracy of population viability analysis in conservation biology
    Barry W. Brook
    Julian J. O'Grady
    Andrew P. Chapman
    Mark A. Burgman
    H. Resit Akçakaya
    Richard Frankham
    Nature, 2000, 404 : 385 - 387
  • [5] Predictive accuracy of population viability analysis in conservation biology
    Brook, BW
    O'Grady, JJ
    Chapman, AP
    Burgman, MA
    Akçakaya, HR
    Frankham, R
    NATURE, 2000, 404 (6776) : 385 - 387
  • [6] Killing for conservation: Wildlife policy in Zimbabwe
    Steinhart, EI
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AFRICAN HISTORICAL STUDIES, 2001, 34 (01): : 171 - 173
  • [7] Is Wildlife Conservation Policy Based in Science?
    Artelle, Kyle A.
    AMERICAN SCIENTIST, 2019, 107 (01) : 38 - 45
  • [8] Killing for conservation: Wildlife policy in Zimbabwe
    Dzingirai, V
    JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN AFRICAN STUDIES, 2003, 29 (01) : 318 - 320
  • [9] Lessons from 30 years of population viability analysis of wildlife populations
    Lacy, Robert C.
    ZOO BIOLOGY, 2019, 38 (01) : 67 - 77
  • [10] Using population viability analysis to guide research and conservation actions for Australia's threatened malleefowl Leipoa ocellata
    Bode, Michael
    Brennan, Karl E. C.
    ORYX, 2011, 45 (04) : 513 - 521