The Syntactic Structure of a Noun Phrase: Austroasiatic vs. Austronesia

被引:0
|
作者
Sultan, Fazal Mohamed Mohamed [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, Fac Social Sci & Humanities, Sch Language Studies & Linguist, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia
来源
关键词
Kensiu language; Malay language; indigenous; noun phrase; Austroasiatic; Austronesian;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The indigenous people of Malaysia consist of 18 ethnics who have their own languages. These people can be classified into three main categories, namely; Negrito, Melayo Proto, and Senoi. Each of these categories can be further sub-divided into different groups. For example, Negrito consists of six races, which are Kensiu, Kintak, Lanoh, Jahai, Mendriq, dan Bateq. Each of these races has its own language which is named after the respective race. The indigenous languages are of the Austroasiatic stocks. In Malaysia, however, the Malay language, which is one of the Austronesian stocks is the national language of Malaysia. The status of the Malay language being in a different stock lays a large implication on the native children who are trying to learn and acquire the language. Due to this, it is vital for us to be aware of the differences of word order between the two stocks, especially at the phrasal and sentential levels. This article discusses and analyzes the differences between the Malay and Kensiu noun phrases. The analysis on the noun phrase of these languages revealed that there are differences in the words that precede the head noun and the words that follow the head noun in the noun phrase of the Kensiu and Malay languages. Surprisingly, some of the word orders in the noun phrases in the Kensiu language are similar to the word order in the noun phrases of the Malay language although they are from different stocks.
引用
收藏
页码:263 / 271
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Syntactic Structure Of Bateq's Noun Phrase
    Sultan, Fazal
    GEMA ONLINE JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE STUDIES, 2009, 9 (01): : 47 - 61
  • [3] OBSERVATIONS CONCERNING THE SYNTACTIC FUNCTIONS OF THE NOUN PHRASE
    Dalalau-Nasta, Lavinia
    DACOROMANIA, 2018, 23 (01): : 38 - 46
  • [4] ON SYNTACTIC BINDING INTO ADJUNCTS IN THE RUSSIAN NOUN PHRASE
    RAPPAPORT, GC
    LINGUISTICS AND PHILOSOPHY, 1987, 10 (04) : 475 - 501
  • [5] Semantic and syntactic forces in noun phrase production
    Vigliocco, G
    Lauer, M
    Damian, MF
    Levelt, WJM
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2002, 28 (01) : 46 - 58
  • [6] Noun phrase structure
    Paperno, Denis
    MANDENKAN-BULLETIN SEMESTRIEL D ETUDES LINGUISTIQUES MANDE, 2014, (51):
  • [7] SYNTACTIC VARIATION IN WESTERN EUROPEAN LANGUAGES. FROM THE NOUN PHRASE TO CLAUSE STRUCTURE
    Sousa, Xulio
    de Benito, Carlota
    Lara, Victor
    DIALECTOLOGIA, 2015, : 1 - 4
  • [8] Linear vs. hierarchical: Two accounts of premodification in the of-binominal noun phrase
    ten Wolde, Elnora
    LINGUISTICS, 2019, 57 (02) : 283 - 326
  • [9] The Structure of Noun Phrase in Kipangwa
    Hauli, Emmanuel
    Sebonde, Rafiki
    Alphonce, Chrispina
    SKASE JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL LINGUISTICS, 2024, 21 (01): : 145 - 168
  • [10] Pronominal Possessors and Syntactic Functions in the Hungarian Possessive Noun Phrase
    Laczko, Tibor
    Rakosi, Gyorgy
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE LFG'19 CONFERENCE, 2019, : 149 - 169