What explains the dispersion effect? Evidence from institutional ownership

被引:0
|
作者
Hwang, Chuan-Yang [1 ]
Wong, Kit Pong [2 ]
Yi, Long [3 ]
机构
[1] Nanyang Technol Univ, Nanyang Business Sch, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Univ Hong Kong, Sch Econ & Finance, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Hong Kong Baptist Univ, Finance & Decis Sci, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Dispersion effect; Analyst incentives; Short-sale constraint; Institutional ownership; Endogeneity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper conducts a joint test of two plausible explanations (difference-in-opinion vs. analyst self-censoring) for why stocks with higher dispersion in analysts' earnings forecasts earn lower subsequent returns (the dispersion effect). We exploit exogenous variations in institutional ownership generated by the annual index reconstitution to address the endogeneity concern of institutional ownership. We find results strongly suggest that analyst self-censoring rather than the more popular difference-in-opinion story is the more plausible explanation for the dispersion effect, at least in a sample where the endogeneity bias of institutional ownership is minimized.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] What explains the dispersion effect? Evidence from institutional ownership
    Hwang, Chuan-Yang
    Wong, Kit Pong
    Yi, Long
    [J]. PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2022, 71
  • [2] The effect of institutional ownership and ownership dispersion on eco-innovation
    Garcia-Sanchez, Isabel-Maria
    Aibar-Guzman, Cristina
    Aibar-Guzman, Beatriz
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2020, 158
  • [3] Foreign institutional ownership and auditor choice: Evidence from worldwide institutional ownership
    Kim, Jeong-Bon
    Pevzner, Mikhail
    Xin, Xiangang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 2019, 50 (01) : 83 - 110
  • [4] Foreign institutional ownership and auditor choice: Evidence from worldwide institutional ownership
    Jeong-Bon Kim
    Mikhail Pevzner
    Xiangang Xin
    [J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2019, 50 : 83 - 110
  • [5] The Effect of Institutional Ownership on Payout Policy: Evidence from Index Thresholds
    Crane, Alan D.
    Michenaud, Sebastien
    Weston, James P.
    [J]. REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2016, 29 (06): : 1377 - 1408
  • [6] The effect of institutional ownership on M&A performance: evidence from China
    Ma, Lina
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2020, 27 (02) : 140 - 144
  • [7] Ownership, Institutional Environment and Institutional Capital: Evidence from China
    Jia, Fang
    Qin, Yao
    Lai, Yan
    Kang, Peipei
    [J]. TRANSDISCIPLINARY ENGINEERING: A PARADIGM SHIFT, 2017, 5 : 222 - 229
  • [8] The effect of institutional ownership on firm innovation: Evidence from Chinese listed firms
    Rong, Zhao
    Wu, Xiaokai
    Boeing, Philipp
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2017, 46 (09) : 1533 - 1551
  • [9] Institutional Ownership and Investment Efficiency: Evidence from Iran
    Moradi, Mohammad
    Yazdifar, Hassan
    Eskandar, Hoda
    Namazi, Navid Reza
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 15 (07)
  • [10] Institutional ownership and earnings management: Evidence from India
    Potharla, Srikanth
    Bhattacharjee, Kaushik
    Iyer, Vishwanathan
    [J]. COGENT ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2021, 9 (01):