WATERSHED CONFIGURATION AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION-SYSTEM PARAMETERIZATION FOR SPUR MODEL HYDROLOGIC SIMULATIONS

被引:0
|
作者
SASOWSKY, KC [1 ]
GARDNER, TW [1 ]
机构
[1] PENN STATE UNIV,DEPT GEOSCI,UNIVERSITY PK,PA 16802
来源
WATER RESOURCES BULLETIN | 1991年 / 27卷 / 01期
关键词
GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; SPUR; HYDROLOGIC MODELING; WATERSHED CONFIGURATION; DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
A grid cell geographic information system (GIS) is used to parameterize SPUR, a quasi-physically based surface runoff model in which a watershed is configured as a set of stream segments and contributing areas. GIS analysis techniques produce various watershed configurations by progressive simplification of a stream network delineated from digital elevation models (DEM). We used three watershed configurations: greater-than-or-equal-to 2nd, greater-than-or-equal-to 4th, and greater-than-or-equal-to 13th Shreve order networks, where the watershed contains 28, 15, and 1 channel segments with 66, 37, and 3 contributing areas, respectively. Watershed configuration controls simulated daily and monthly sums of runoff volumes. For the climatic and topographic setting in southeastern Arizona the greater-than-or-equal-to 4th order configuration of the stream network and contributing areas produces results that are typically as good as the greater-than-or-equal-to 2nd order network. However both are consistently better than the greater-than-or-equal-to 13th order configuration. Due to the degree of parameterization in SPUR, model simulations cannot be significantly improved by increasing watershed configuration beyond the greater-than-or-equal-to 4th order network. However, a range of Soil Conservation Service curve numbers derived from rainfall/runoff data can affect model simulations. Higher curve numbers yield better results for the greater-than-or-equal-to 2nd order network while lower curve numbers yield better results for the greater-than-or-equal-to 4th order network.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 18
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION-SYSTEM FOR HYDROLOGIC-SIMULATION AND ANALYSIS
    GRAYMAN, WM
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS-AMERICAN GEOPHYSICAL UNION, 1977, 58 (06): : 383 - 383
  • [2] URBAN WATERSHED MODELING USING GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION-SYSTEM
    GREENE, RG
    CRUISE, JF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 1995, 121 (04): : 318 - 325
  • [3] HYDROLOGIC PARAMETER-ESTIMATION USING GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION-SYSTEM
    BHASKAR, NR
    JAMES, WP
    DEVULAPALLI, RS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 1992, 118 (05): : 492 - 512
  • [4] DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION OF A GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION-SYSTEM FOR WETLAND WATERSHED ANALYSIS
    REINELT, LE
    VELIKANJE, J
    BELL, EJ
    [J]. COMPUTERS ENVIRONMENT AND URBAN SYSTEMS, 1991, 15 (04) : 239 - 251
  • [5] AN AUTO-CAD-BASED WATERSHED INFORMATION-SYSTEM FOR THE HYDROLOGIC MODEL HEC-1
    CLINE, TJ
    MOLINAS, A
    JULIEN, PY
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES BULLETIN, 1989, 25 (03): : 641 - 652
  • [6] MODELING NONPOINT POLLUTION AT THE WATERSHED LEVEL WITH THE AID OF A GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION-SYSTEM
    EVANS, BM
    MILLER, DA
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE SYMPOSIUM ON NONPOINT POLLUTION : 1988 - POLICY, ECONOMY, MANAGEMENT, AND APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY, 1988, : 283 - 291
  • [7] GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION-SYSTEM TRENDS
    MCGREGOR, D
    [J]. GIS/LIS 88 PROCEEDINGS : ACCESSING THE WORLD, VOL 2, 1988, : 915 - 921
  • [8] DAYTON GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION-SYSTEM
    WICKS, DJ
    BROOKS, J
    [J]. PAPERS FROM THE 1989 ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE URBAN AND REGIONAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS ASSOCIATION, VOL 2, 1989, : 185 - 197
  • [9] IMPLEMENTING LARSON AND SADIQS LOCATION MODEL IN A GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION-SYSTEM
    DING, YM
    BAVEJA, A
    BATTA, R
    [J]. COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1994, 21 (04) : 447 - 454
  • [10] TRAPHYC-BV - A HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION-SYSTEM
    MOUSSA, R
    BOCQUILLON, C
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SOFTWARE, 1994, 9 (04): : 217 - 226