Preferences for Government Investment in Energy Programs: Support for New Energy Production vs. Energy Conservation

被引:2
|
作者
Truelove, Heather Barnes [1 ,2 ]
Greenberg, Michael [3 ]
机构
[1] Consortium Risk Evaluat Stakeholder Participat, Nashville, TN 37212 USA
[2] Vanderbilt Inst Energy & Environm, Nashville, TN USA
[3] Rutgers State Univ, Edward J Bloustein Sch & Consortium Risk Evaluat, New Brunswick, NJ USA
关键词
D O I
10.1017/S1466046611000251
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
With energy legislation pending in Congress, research is urgently needed on the public's preferences for environmental policies. This study investigated preferences for government investment in new energy production relative to energy conservation and the variables that influence these preferences among members of the general public and those who live near nuclear and/or coal energy facilities (site-specific sample). A survey using random digit dialing assessed preferences for new energy production relative to energy conservation, beliefs about coal and nuclear energy, cultural worldview, trust in nuclear and coal agencies, environmental activism, and demographics among a general public sample (n = 800) and a site-specific sample (n = 2,400). Results showed that fewer than half of the participants desired more than half of the funding to be invested in new energy production relative to energy conservation. The general public sample's preferences were driven primarily by beliefs about coal, hierarchical values, environmental concern, and gender. The model of the site-specific sample's preferences was more complex and showed that preferences were driven primarily by coal and nuclear beliefs, hierarchical values, environmental concern, age, and race. Overall, the results underline the importance of investigating the underpinnings of beliefs of different groups and being cognizant of the unique factors that influence energy preferences among these groups.
引用
收藏
页码:184 / 197
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] REVIEW OF GOVERNMENT AND UTILITY ENERGY-CONSERVATION PROGRAMS
    CLINTON, J
    GELLER, H
    HIRST, E
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENERGY, 1986, 11 : 95 - 142
  • [2] Available energy vs. "energy"
    Pulsifer, HB
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1916, 44 : 134 - 135
  • [3] Energy politics vs. energy policy
    Williams, Bob
    [J]. OIL & GAS JOURNAL, 2008, 106 (37) : B4 - B4
  • [4] Social benefits of financial investment support in energy conservation policy
    Haugland, T
    [J]. ENERGY JOURNAL, 1996, 17 (02): : 79 - 102
  • [5] Understanding the risk perception of energy efficiency investments: Investment perspective vs. energy bill perspective
    Rockstuhl, Sebastian
    Wenninger, Simon
    Wiethe, Christian
    Haeckel, Bjoern
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2021, 159
  • [6] ENERGY-CONSERVATION PROGRAMS
    KUMMERLE, HF
    [J]. AMERICAN CERAMIC SOCIETY BULLETIN, 1978, 57 (11): : 1021 - 1023
  • [7] Energy conservation programs in China
    Levine, MD
    Sinton, JE
    [J]. IECEC 96 - PROCEEDINGS OF THE 31ST INTERSOCIETY ENERGY CONVERSION ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-4, 1996, : 2324 - 2329
  • [8] The energy debate: Climate vs. energy security
    Sever, Megan
    [J]. GEOTIMES, 2007, 52 (08): : 46 - 46
  • [9] Risk vs. Reward: A Methodology to Assess Investment in Marine Energy
    Hutcheson, John
    de Andres, Adrian
    Jeffrey, Henry
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 8 (09):
  • [10] US energy independence vs. energy security
    不详
    [J]. HYDROCARBON PROCESSING, 2012, 91 (12): : 12 - 12