COMPARATIVE CHEMOSENSITIVITY PROFILES IN 4 HUMAN OVARIAN-CARCINOMA CELL-LINES MEASURING ATP BIOLUMINESCENCE

被引:55
|
作者
PETRU, E [1 ]
SEVIN, BU [1 ]
PERRAS, J [1 ]
BOIKE, G [1 ]
RAMOS, R [1 ]
NGUYEN, H [1 ]
AVERETTE, HE [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV MIAMI,SCH MED,DEPT OBSTET & GYNECOL,DIV GYNECOL ONCOL,MIAMI,FL 33101
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0090-8258(90)90032-G
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
cis-Platinum (DDP) and cyclophosphamide are commonly used for the treatment of ovarian cancer; however, survival remains poor. The degree of cytotoxicity of the standard antineoplastic agents DDP, 4-hydroperoxy-cyclophosphamide (4-OH-CTX), mitomycin C (MITOM C), vincristine (VCR), etoposide (VP-16), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), cytosine arabinoside (ARA-C), and interferon (IF) in four representative ovarian cancer cell lines was studied using the ATP assay, which measures total cell kill. Cell lines CAOV-3, OVCAR-3, SKOV-3, and BG-1, which were derived from both pretreated and untreated patients, were exposed to six different concentrations for 90 min. On Day 7, intracellular ATP determinations were done. Sensitivity was defined as ≥50% cell kill at 0.5× peak plasma concentration as compared to controls. For 4-OH-CTX and ARA-C, 3 and 0.5 μg/ml were chosen as 0.5× reference values. For each drug in each cell line, a highly reproducible dose-response relationship was observed. CAOV-3 cells were sensitive to all drugs except DDP, ARA-C, and IF, and OVCAR-3 cells to all except DDP and IF. SKOV-3 cells were resistant to all agents except VCR, and BG-1 cells to all except MITOM C and 5-FU. The apparent heterogeneic response to antineoplastic agents observed in the above cell lines underscores the importance of assessing individual patients' sensitivity profiles before treatment. © 1990.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 160
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] CYTOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF 4 HUMAN OVARIAN-CARCINOMA CELL-LINES
    SHEER, D
    SHEPPARD, DM
    GORMAN, PA
    WARD, B
    WHELAN, RDH
    HILL, BT
    CANCER GENETICS AND CYTOGENETICS, 1987, 26 (02) : 339 - 349
  • [2] ESTABLISHMENT AND CHARACTERIZATION OF 4 HUMAN EPITHELIAL OVARIAN-CARCINOMA CELL-LINES
    HIRTE, HW
    KAISER, JS
    BACCHETTI, S
    CANCER, 1994, 74 (03) : 900 - 906
  • [3] IN-VITRO ACTIVITY OF TITANOCENEDICHLORIDE VERSUS CISPLATIN IN 4 OVARIAN-CARCINOMA CELL-LINES EVALUATED BY A MICROTITER PLATE ATP BIOLUMINESCENCE ASSAY
    KURBACHER, CM
    BRUCKNER, HW
    ANDREOTTI, PE
    KURBACHER, JA
    SASS, G
    KREBS, D
    ANTI-CANCER DRUGS, 1995, 6 (05) : 697 - 704
  • [4] CHARACTERIZATION OF 2 NEW HUMAN OVARIAN-CARCINOMA CELL-LINES
    SINNA, GA
    BECKMAN, G
    LUNDGREN, E
    NORDENSON, I
    ROOS, G
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1979, 7 (03) : 267 - 280
  • [5] IMMUNOTOXINS DIRECTED AGAINST HUMAN OVARIAN-CARCINOMA CELL-LINES
    PIRKER, R
    FITZGERALD, DJP
    WILLINGHAM, MC
    LUDWIG, H
    PASTAN, I
    BLUT, 1987, 55 (04): : 261 - 261
  • [6] MECHANISMS OF CISPLATIN CYTOTOXICITY IN HUMAN OVARIAN-CARCINOMA CELL-LINES
    SHELLARD, S
    HOSKING, L
    FICHTINGERSCHEPMAN, AM
    HILL, BT
    BIOCHEMICAL SOCIETY TRANSACTIONS, 1990, 18 (04) : 622 - 622
  • [7] RESPONSE OF HUMAN ENDOMETRIUM AND OVARIAN-CARCINOMA CELL-LINES TO PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY
    RAAB, GH
    SCHNEIDER, AF
    EIERMANN, W
    GOTTSCHALKDEPONTE, H
    BAUMGARTNER, R
    BEYER, W
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 1990, 248 (01) : 13 - 20
  • [8] COMPARATIVE CHEMOSENSITIVITY PROFILES IN 3 HUMAN BREAST-CANCER CELL-LINES WITH THE ATP-CELL VIABILITY ASSAY
    KOECHLI, OR
    SEVIN, BU
    PERRAS, JP
    ANGIOLI, R
    UNTCH, M
    STEREN, A
    RAMACHANDRAN, C
    AVERETTE, HE
    ONCOLOGY, 1994, 51 (06) : 552 - 558
  • [9] EXPRESSION OF A HUMAN MULTIDRUG RESISTANCE GENE IN HUMAN OVARIAN-CARCINOMA CELL-LINES
    SEKIYA, S
    NUNOYAMA, T
    SHIRASAWA, H
    KIMURA, H
    KAWATA, M
    IIJIMA, N
    SUGIMOTO, Y
    TSURUO, T
    TAKAMIZAWA, H
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 1992, 251 (02) : 79 - 86
  • [10] CELLULAR HETEROGENEITY OF CELL-LINES FROM AN OVARIAN-CARCINOMA
    CHAO, KC
    NG, HT
    CHANG, CC
    HU, CP
    CHANG, CM
    TUMOR BIOLOGY, 1987, 8 (06) : 295 - 296