共 4 条
- [2] OBLIGATION OF THE COMPANY TO PROVIDE THE LEGAL REPRESENTATION OF THE WORKERS WITH INFORMATION AND COPY OF THE ADDITIONAL HOUR AGREEMENTS (COMMENTARY ON THE JUDGMENT OF THE SUPREME COURT OF FEBRUARY 16, 2021) [J]. REVISTA GENERAL DEL DERECHO DEL TRABAJO Y DE LA SEGURIDAD SOCIAL, 2021, (59): : 768 - 774
- [3] THE JURISPRUDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF RESPONSIBILITY OF THE STATE ON THE BASIS OF THE PRINCIPLE OF PROCEDURAL AUTONOMY AND ITS LIMITS (EQUIVALENCE AND EFFECTIVENESS): AN EXHAUSTED APPROACH AFTER THE JUDGMENT COMMISSION V. SPAIN (C-278/20) [J]. REVISTA DE DERECHO COMUNITARIO EUROPEO, 2023, (74): : 111 - 146
- [4] Der Bundesgerichtshof stärkt die Rechte der Ärzte gegen JamedaBGH Urteil vom 20.02.2018 – VI ZR 30/17The German Federal Court of Justice (BGH) strengthens the rights of physicians against JamedaBGH verdict dated 20 February 2018 – VI ZR 30/17 [J]. best practice onkologie, 2019, 14 (3) : 104 - 106