机构:
Univ Buenos Aires, CONICET, Fac Psicol, Yerua 4939, RA-1427 Buenos Aires, DF, ArgentinaUniv Buenos Aires, CONICET, Fac Psicol, Yerua 4939, RA-1427 Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
Bareiro, Julieta
[1
]
机构:
[1] Univ Buenos Aires, CONICET, Fac Psicol, Yerua 4939, RA-1427 Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
In recent years the various ties that bind the Psychoanalytic and Hermeneutic Phenomenology has been an active domain of research. This work focus on the relationship between M. Heidegger and D. Winnicott. Indeed, after the publication of "Transitional objects and phenomena" (1951), Winnicott abandons science as a starting point of psychoanalysis so that the question of continuity of being can take place. This "turn" allows, without consciously looking for it, an approach to the philosophy of Heidegger. This is possible since they addressed themselves to similar problems, even though nothing indicates that they each other's work. This article is based on one of those problems: on the true or false possibilities of inhabiting the world, or, to put it differently, on the authentic and inauthentic ways of existence.