The United States and the International Criminal Court: Avoiding Jurisdiction Through Bilateral Agreements in Reliance on Article 98

被引:5
|
作者
Bogdan, Attila [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Cook Cty States Attorneys Off, Chicago, IL 60602 USA
[2] Depaul Univ, Coll Law, Int Human Rights Law Inst, Chicago, IL 60604 USA
关键词
International Criminal Court; bilateral; Article; 98; agreement; jurisdictional basis; extradition; complementarity; State-party obligations; legislative history; Status of Forces Agreements (SOFA); UCMJ; U.S; law; Vienna Convention;
D O I
10.1163/156753608X265222
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
State-parties to the International Criminal Court Statute have a general obligation to cooperate with the Court. The duty to cooperate represents the functional cornerstone of the Court's existence. A narrow exception to this duty is contained in Article 98 of the Statute, which provides for limited circumstances in which the Court must refrain from seeking a surrender of an individual to the Court. Following rules of treaty interpretation, as well as an examination of the legislative history of the ICC Statute, the article explores the scope of Article 98, the provision the United States relied on in concluding a series of bilateral agreements that are primarily aimed at preventing the surrender of any U.S. nationals to the ICC. The article considers the issue of what impact, if any, the agreements have in the context of extradition, and the U.S.' legal ability to fulfill the commitments made in the "Article 98" agreements.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 54
页数:54
相关论文
共 50 条