AGRONOMIC PERFORMANCE OF FASCIATED SOYBEAN GENOTYPES AND THEIR ISOGENIC LINES

被引:10
|
作者
LEFFEL, RC
BERNARD, RL
YOCUM, JO
机构
关键词
D O I
10.2135/cropsci1993.0011183X003300030002x
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The fasciated soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] is a morphological type caused by the recessive gene f. The original sources of the gene exhibit a broadened and flattened stem, with most of the pods at the stem tip. Fasciation has been suggested as a new gene for soybean improvement. These studies were conducted to determine (i) the agronomic performance of improved fasciated lines and (ii) the average effects of the fasciation ff genes in soybean via isogenic line comparisons. Second-cycle improved fasciated genotypes were developed from each of six crosses of first-cycle improved fasciated lines x 'Hobbit' and evaluated in local and regional field tests. Five pairs of F9 isogenic lines, ff vs. FF, were developed from each of the six crosses by maintenance of heterozygosity at the fasciation locus. Selection for seed yield among fasciated lines apparently decreased penetrance and expressivity of the ff genes. Second-cycle fasciated lines were developed that were comparable to current cultivars in seed yields in lower-yielding but not in higher-yielding environments. Seed yields of fasciated lines were not increased at higher plant densities in narrower rows. Fasciated lines were generally taller, more susceptible to lodging, and exhibited poorer quality seed as compared with commercial cultivars. The average effect of the ff gene in 30 pairs of F9 isogenic lines was +3 d plant maturity, +9 cm plant height, +2.3 plant lodging score, +14 mg seed-1 seed weight, +0.1 seed quality score, and -441 kg ha-1 seed yield. Most of the detrimental effects of the fasciated gene are probably attributable to its increased plant lodging.
引用
收藏
页码:427 / 432
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Agronomic performance of palisade grass genotypes in succession to soybean
    Zago Machado, Luis Armando
    do Valle, Cacilda Borges
    PESQUISA AGROPECUARIA BRASILEIRA, 2011, 46 (11) : 1454 - 1462
  • [3] PERFORMANCE OF ISOGENIC SOYBEAN LINES IN MONOCULTURE AND RELAY INTERCROPPING ENVIRONMENTS
    MCBROOM, RL
    HADLEY, HH
    BROWN, CM
    CROP SCIENCE, 1981, 21 (05) : 669 - 672
  • [4] Boron Fertilization Improves the Agronomic Performance of Soybean Genotypes in the Brazilian Cerrado
    Liborio, Igor Freitas
    Campos, Cid Naudi Silva
    Cordeiro Santana, Dthenifer
    Oliveira, Izabela Cristina de
    de Oliveira, Joao Lucas Gouveia
    Pereira Ribeiro Teodoro, Larissa
    Rojo Baio, Fabio Henrique
    Theodoro, Gustavo de Faria
    Teodoro, Paulo Eduardo
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [5] AGRONOMIC PERFORMANCE AND GENETIC DIVERSITY AMONG LINES AND SOYBEAN CULTIVARS
    Vieira Machado, Beliza Queiroz
    Oliveira Nogueira, Ana Paula
    Hamawaki, Osvaldo Toshiyuki
    Jorge, Gabriel Lemes
    Rezende, Gabriel Fernandes
    Glasenapp, Jacqueline Siqueira
    Hamawaki, Raphael Lemes
    Lemes Hamawaki, Cristiane Divina
    BIOSCIENCE JOURNAL, 2017, 33 (06): : 1419 - 1430
  • [6] AGRONOMIC PERFORMANCE OF THE LINES OF SOYBEAN DEVELOPED BY UFU BREEDING PROGRAM
    Sagata, Erika
    Hamawaki, Osvaldo Toshiyuki
    de Sousa, Larissa Barbosa
    Lemes Hamawaki, Cristiane Divina
    BIOSCIENCE JOURNAL, 2009, 25 (06): : 112 - 120
  • [7] Tocopherol content and agronomic performance of soybean lines with reduced palmitate
    Scherder, CW
    Fehr, WR
    Welke, GA
    Wang, T
    CROP SCIENCE, 2006, 46 (03) : 1286 - 1290
  • [8] COMPARISON OF SOYBEAN GENOTYPES FOR RESISTANCE TO AND AGRONOMIC PERFORMANCE IN THE PRESENCE OF BROWN STEM ROT
    MENGISTU, A
    GRAU, CR
    GRITTON, ET
    PLANT DISEASE, 1986, 70 (12) : 1095 - 1098
  • [9] Agronomic performance of soybean plant introductions and their genetic similarity to elite lines
    Sneller, CH
    Miles, JW
    Hoyt, JM
    CROP SCIENCE, 1997, 37 (05) : 1595 - 1600
  • [10] Agronomic performance of strawberry genotypes
    Passos, Francisco A.
    Trani, Paulo E.
    Carvalho, Cassia R. L.
    HORTICULTURA BRASILEIRA, 2015, 33 (02) : 267 - 271