Self-determination and Secession: Human Rights-based Conflict Resolution

被引:2
|
作者
Velasco, Zoilo A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Dept Foreign Affairs, Pasay City, Philippines
[2] San Beda Coll Law, Manila, Philippines
关键词
Self-determination; secession; independence; ethno-national conflicts; conflict resolution; peace process; human rights; territorial integrity;
D O I
10.1163/18719732-12341271
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Throughout its development as an international law principle, there prevailed an assumption that self-determination gives rise to secession. This assumption, which has fuelled the most violent ethno-national conflicts in modern history, is however misleading. Self-determination does not lead to secession. Self-determination is conceptually and legally separate and independent from secession. Its association with secession actually makes self-determination a legal anomaly. Whether a "nation" can secede is not a function of self-determination but is dictated by an entirely different variable - effective power or authority in international politics. There is a need to break the link between self-determination and secession, and instead recognise self-determination as a human right per se rather than a principle that justifies, confuses, and exacerbates ethnonational conflicts. The result is a change in our way of understanding, and hopefully resolving, existing secessionist struggles and ethno-national conflicts worldwide.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 105
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条