Life-Cycle Assessment of In Situ Thermal Remediation

被引:3
|
作者
Fisher, Angela [1 ]
机构
[1] GEs Global Res Ctr, Ecoassessment Ctr Excellence, Environm Technol Lab, Niskayuna, NY 12309 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1002/rem.21331
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A detailed cradle-to-grave life-cycle assessment (LCA) of an in situ thermal treatment remedy for a chlorinated-solvent-contaminated site was performed using process LCA. The major materials and activities necessary to install, operate, monitor, and deconstruct the remedy were included in the analysis. The analysis was based on an actual site remedy design and implementation to determine the potential environmental impacts, pinpoint major contributors to impacts, and identify opportunities for improvements during future implementation. The Electro-ThermalDynamic Stripping Process (ET-DSPTM) in situ thermal technology coupled with a dual-phase extraction and treatment system was evaluated for the remediation of 4,400 yd(3) of tetrachloroethene-and trichloroethene-impacted soil, groundwater, and bedrock. The analysis was based on an actual site with an estimated source mass of 2,200 lbs of chlorinated solvents. The remedy was separated into four stages: remedy installation, remedy operation, monitoring, and remedy deconstruction. Environmental impacts were assessed using Sima Pro software, the ecoinvent database, and the ReCiPe midpoint and endpoint methods. The operation stage of the remedy dominated the environmental impacts across all categories due to the large amount of electricity required by the thermal treatment technology. Alternate sources of electricity could significantly reduce the environmental impacts of the remedy across all impact categories. Other large impacts were observed in the installation stage resulting from the large amount of diesel fuel, steel, activated carbon, and asphalt materials required to implement the technology. These impacts suggest where opportunities for footprint reductions can be found through best management practices such as increased materials reuse, increased recycled-content materials use, and clean fuels and emission control technologies. Smaller impacts were observed in the monitoring and deconstruction stages. Normalized results show the largest environmental burdens to fossil depletion, human toxicity, particulate matter formation, and climate-change categories resulting from activities associated with mining of fossil fuels for use in electricity production. In situ thermal treatment can reliably remediate contaminated source areas with contaminants located in low-permeability zones, providing complete destruction of contaminants in a short amount of time, quick return of the site to productive use, and minimized quantities of hazardous materials stored in landfills for future generations to remediate. However, this remediation strategy can also result in significant emissions over a short period of time. It is difficult to quantify the overall value of short-term cleanups with intense treatment emissions against longer-term cleanups with lower treatment emissions because of the environmental, social, and economic trade-offs that need to be considered and understood. LCA is a robust, quantitative tool to help inform stakeholder discussions related to the remedy selection process, trade-off considerations, and environmental footprint-reduction opportunities, and to complement a broader toolbox for the evaluation of sustainable remediation strategies. (C) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 92
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] In situ remediation life-cycle cost vs. substrate cost
    Wilson, Scott B.
    [J]. GROUND WATER MONITORING AND REMEDIATION, 2007, 27 (04): : 143 - 143
  • [2] Optimizing the Environmental Performance of In Situ Thermal Remediation Technologies Using Life Cycle Assessment
    Lemming, Gitte
    Nielsen, Steffen G.
    Weber, Klaus
    Heron, Gorm
    Baker, Ralph S.
    Falkenberg, Jacqueline A.
    Terkelsen, Mads
    Jensen, Carsten B.
    Bjerg, Poul L.
    [J]. GROUND WATER MONITORING AND REMEDIATION, 2013, 33 (03): : 38 - 51
  • [3] Life-cycle framework for assessment of site remediation options: Case study
    Page, CA
    Diamond, ML
    Campbell, M
    McKenna, S
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 1999, 18 (04) : 801 - 810
  • [4] Life-cycle assessment modelling and life-cycle assessment evaluation of a triboelement
    Wani, M. F.
    Anand, A.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART J-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING TRIBOLOGY, 2010, 224 (J11) : 1209 - 1220
  • [5] LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT
    WEISSMAN, AB
    [J]. ISSUES IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1994, 11 (01) : 18 - 18
  • [6] Life-cycle assessment
    Riebel, P
    [J]. PULP & PAPER-CANADA, 2002, 103 (04) : 57 - 57
  • [7] Life-cycle assessment
    Harsch, M
    Schuckert, M
    Eyerer, P
    Saur, K
    [J]. ADVANCED MATERIALS & PROCESSES, 1996, 149 (06): : 43 - 46
  • [8] Life-cycle assessment - An abridged life-cycle assessment of electric vehicle batteries
    Steele, NLC
    Allen, DT
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1998, 32 (01) : 40A - 46A
  • [9] Take a life-cycle view of site remediation
    Page, CA
    Diamond, ML
    Campbell, M
    McKenna, S
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING PROGRESS, 1998, 94 (08) : 63 - 70
  • [10] Life-cycle framework for assessment of site remediation options: Method and generic survey
    Diamond, ML
    Page, CA
    Campbell, M
    McKenna, S
    Lall, R
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 1999, 18 (04) : 788 - 800