RESPONSE OF ROOTS TO MECHANICAL IMPEDANCE

被引:123
|
作者
ATWELL, BJ
机构
[1] School of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney
关键词
COMPACTION; ETHYLENE; IMPEDANCE; ROOT; SOIL;
D O I
10.1016/0098-8472(93)90053-I
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
The response of roots to mechanical impedance has been addressed in the literature largely from the physical point of view. The properties of soils which cause them to become impenetrable by roots have been analysed in detail, with particular reference to soil texture. Factors such as high soil cohesion (in clay soils) and high angle of internal friction (in sandy soils) contribute to soil strength. However, root growth often involves radial deformation of the soil near the growing apex, requiring a consideration of soil compression as well. While soils of all textures can impede root growth, those with high clay content are thought to be most inhibitory. Predictions of soil strength can also be obtained from penetrometer probes with different diameters and tip shapes. A precise physical analogue of root growth is not possible but probes which penetrate soil by deformation around the tip give surprisingly good estimates of relative soil strength. The capacity of roots to minimize friction with the soil and expand radially is thought to account for the lower absolute resistance perceived by roots than by penetrometer probes. Roots oppose strong soil by forces of osmotic origin acting on both the soil and the expanding cell walls. The response of roots is, however, poorly understood. Cortical cells tend to become broader and shorter, causing the root axis to thicken. Root volumes and osmotic pressures change as a result. The role of ethylene as a mediator of structural changes is in question. Root (and shoot) carbohydrate metabolism is also changed by impedance in a way that produces a favourable balance of biomass above and below ground and prevents carbohydrate deprivation to growing tissues. However, the co-ordination of changes in anatomy and metabolism remains a mystery. The scope for selection of plants tolerant to mechanical impedance is discussed and there are reasons for optimism if new screening criteria are adopted.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 40
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] THE INFLUENCE OF MECHANICAL IMPEDANCE ON THE GROWTH OF MAIZE ROOTS
    VEEN, BW
    PLANT AND SOIL, 1982, 66 (01) : 101 - 109
  • [2] ETHYLENE IN RELATION TO RESPONSE OF ROOTS TO PHYSICAL IMPEDANCE
    KAYS, SJ
    NICKLOW, CW
    SIMONS, DH
    PLANT AND SOIL, 1974, 40 (03) : 565 - 571
  • [3] THE EFFECT OF MECHANICAL IMPEDANCE ON ETHYLENE PRODUCTION BY MAIZE ROOTS
    WHALEN, MC
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE BOTANIQUE, 1988, 66 (11): : 2139 - 2142
  • [4] ETHYLENE EVOLUTION FROM MAIZE (ZEA-MAYS L) SEEDLING ROOTS AND SHOOTS IN RESPONSE TO MECHANICAL IMPEDANCE
    SARQUIS, JI
    JORDAN, WR
    MORGAN, PW
    PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1991, 96 (04) : 1171 - 1177
  • [5] Partial mechanical impedance can increase the turgor of seedling pea roots
    Clark, LJ
    Whalley, WR
    Barraclough, PB
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2001, 52 (354) : 167 - 171
  • [6] Evaluation of agar and agarose gels for studying mechanical impedance in rice roots
    Clark, LJ
    Whalley, WR
    Leigh, RA
    Dexter, AR
    Barraclough, PB
    PLANT AND SOIL, 1999, 207 (01) : 37 - 43
  • [7] MECHANICAL IMPEDANCE EFFECTS ON OXYGEN-UPTAKE AND POROSITY OF DRYBEAN ROOTS
    SCHUMACHER, TE
    SMUCKER, AJM
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1981, 73 (01) : 51 - 55
  • [8] Complete mechanical impedance increases the turgor of cells in the apex of pea roots
    Clark, LJ
    Whalley, WR
    Dexter, AR
    Barraclough, PB
    Leigh, RA
    PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT, 1996, 19 (09): : 1099 - 1102
  • [9] Evaluation of agar and agarose gels for studying mechanical impedance in rice roots
    Clark L.J.
    Whalley W.R.
    Leigh R.A.
    Dexter A.R.
    Barraclough P.B.
    Plant and Soil, 1999, 207 (1) : 37 - 43
  • [10] MECHANICAL IMPEDANCE INCREASES ALUMINUM TOLERANCE OF SOYBEAN (GLYCINE-MAX) ROOTS
    HORST, WJ
    KLOTZ, F
    SZULKIEWICZ, P
    PLANT AND SOIL, 1990, 124 (02) : 227 - 231