Te Whariki revisited: How approaches to assessment can make valued learning visible

被引:0
|
作者
McLachlan, Claire [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Waikato, Fac Educ, Sch Curriculum & Pedag, Te Hononga, Hamilton, New Zealand
来源
HE KUPU | 2018年 / 5卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
In 2016, Te Whariki: He Whariki Matauranga mo nga Mokopuna o Aotearoa: Early Childhood Curriculum (Te Whariki) (Ministry of Education [MoE], 2017), New Zealand's early childhood curriculum was updated for the first time in 20 years. Although the gazetted principles, strands and goals of the curriculum were not part of the update, the remainder of the curriculum was revised to meet the changing social and linguistic context, the revised national curriculum and associated documents, reviews of early childhood practice and relevant theory and research. The updated curriculum has reduced learning outcomes (from 118 to 20) and stronger guidance on the need for both informal and formal approaches to assessment to ensure children's learning in each strand are assessed. This article reflects on the changes between the 1996 and 2017 version of the curriculum in relation to assessment and the rationale for the changes. Approaches to both 'in the moment' and planned assessment are explored and the usefulness of approaches which enable teachers to reflect on 'discrepant data' and support children's learning in each strand are examined.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 56
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Learning selection revisited: How can agricultural researchers make a difference?
    Douthwaite, Boru
    Gummert, Martin
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2010, 103 (05) : 245 - 255
  • [2] Students' assessment preferences and approaches to learning: can formative assessment make a difference?
    Gijbels, David
    Dochy, Filip
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL STUDIES, 2006, 32 (04) : 399 - 409
  • [3] Making Teaching and Learning Visible: How Can Learning Designs Be Represented?
    Caeiro-Rodriguez, Manuel
    [J]. TEEM'19: SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TECHNOLOGICAL ECOSYSTEMS FOR ENHANCING MULTICULTURALITY, 2019, : 265 - 274
  • [4] How Can Microfluidic and Microfabrication Approaches Make Experiments More Physiologically Relevant?
    Sohn, Lydia L.
    Schwille, Petra
    Hierlemann, Andreas
    Tay, Savas
    Samitier, Josep
    Fu, Jianping
    Loskill, Peter
    [J]. CELL SYSTEMS, 2020, 11 (03) : 209 - 211
  • [5] Distinctive mobile learning: where it is different and how it can make a difference
    Quan, Zhi
    Grant, Lynn
    Hocking, Darryl
    Connor, Andy
    [J]. INTERACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS, 2024, 32 (01) : 257 - 272
  • [6] How international marketers make decisions: exploring approaches to learning and using heuristics
    Guercini, Simone
    Freeman, Susan Maria
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL MARKETING REVIEW, 2023, 40 (03) : 429 - 451
  • [7] Feedback as an assessment for learning tool: How useful can it be?
    Zhang, Lulu
    Zheng, Ying
    [J]. ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2018, 43 (07) : 1120 - 1132
  • [8] How can we make use of learner interaction in online learning environments?
    Donmez, Onur
    Simsek, Omer
    Arikan, Y. Deniz
    [J]. WORLD CONFERENCE ON LEARNING, TEACHING AND ADMINISTRATION PAPERS, 2010, 9
  • [9] How are student approaches to learning navigation correlated with their assessment outcomes?
    Marc P. Bellette
    [J]. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 2005, 9 (2) : 31 - 43
  • [10] How Enaction and Ecological Approaches Can Contribute to Sports and Skill Learning
    Aviles, Carlos
    Navia, Jose A.
    Ruiz-Perez, Luis-Miguel
    Zapatero-Ayuso, Jorge A.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 11