CORRELATES OF FORMAL OPERATIONAL REASONING - A NEO-PIAGETIAN ANALYSIS

被引:26
|
作者
NIAZ, M
机构
[1] Chemistry Department, Universidad de Oriente, Cumana, Apartado Postal 90, .Sucre
关键词
D O I
10.1002/tea.3660280104
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Most Piagetian formal operational reasoning tasks show horizontal decalage; that is, subjects pass certain tasks and fail others that have the same logical structure. The study reported here analyzes the importance of individual difference variables, as postulated by the neo‐Piagetian theory of Pascual‐Leone, in explaining subject performance in formal reasoning. A sample of 72 freshman students were administered a test of formal reasoning having 20 items of different types of reasoning, and the tests of the individual difference variables. Results obtained from multiple regression analyses show that Pascual‐Leone's structural M‐capacity (Ms) is the most consistent predictor of success in the different formal reasoning tasks, followed by Witkin's cognitive style, and to a much lesser degree Raven's progressive matrices, and Pascual‐Leone's functional M‐capacity (Mf). It was found that in the total score on the 20 items of formal reasoning, Ms accounted for 23.3% of the variance (R = 0.483, F = 6.39, p = 0.014) and Witkin's Group Embedded Figures Test, increased the multiple R significantly (F = 7.77, p = 0.007) and accounted for 7.6% of the variance. Mf and the Raven test did not make a significant contribution to the regression equation. Correlation coefficients among most of the items having the same reasoning pattern but different content are generally low but statistically significant (p < 0.01). Intercorrelations among items having the same formal reasoning pattern and content are fairly high (p < 0.001). These results emphasize the importance of individual difference variables: information‐processing capacity (Pascual‐Leone) and oversensitivity to potentially misleading information (Witkin). It is suggested that in order to understand student performance in formal reasoning tasks, we should expect horizontal decalages as a rule and not the exception, as Piaget had postulated. Educational implications are drawn. Copyright © 1991 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., A Wiley Company
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 40
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Neo-Piagetian Forms of Reasoning in Software Development Process Construction
    Falkner, Katrina
    Vivian, Rebecca
    Falkner, Nickolas J. G.
    [J]. 2013 LEARNING AND TEACHING IN COMPUTING AND ENGINEERING (LATICE 2013), 2013, : 31 - 38
  • [2] Neo-Piagetian Theory as a Guide to Curriculum Analysis
    Szabo, Claudia
    Falkner, Katrina
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 45TH ACM TECHNICAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION (SIGCSE'14), 2014, : 115 - 120
  • [3] THE DEVELOPMENT OF COMPUTATIONAL ESTIMATION - A NEO-PIAGETIAN ANALYSIS
    CASE, R
    SOWDER, JT
    [J]. COGNITION AND INSTRUCTION, 1990, 7 (02) : 79 - 104
  • [4] LEARNING AND DEVELOPMENT - NEO-PIAGETIAN INTERPRETATION
    CASE, R
    [J]. HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 1972, 15 (06) : 339 - 358
  • [5] Postformal Thought and Neo-Piagetian Perspectives
    Krzemien, Deisy
    Pietrantuono, Lidia
    Carnero Rodriguez, Maria Paula
    Urquijo, Sebastian
    [J]. ACTA PSIQUIATRICA Y PSICOLOGICA DE AMERICA LATINA, 2019, 65 (04) : 249 - 259
  • [6] NEO-PIAGETIAN THEORIES AND EDUCATIONAL PRACTICE
    SHAYER, M
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1987, 22 (5-6) : 751 - 772
  • [7] NEO-PIAGETIAN THEORY - RETROSPECT AND PROSPECT
    CASE, R
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1987, 22 (5-6) : 773 - 791
  • [8] ERRORS OF MISCLASSIFICATION IN NEO-PIAGETIAN RESEARCH
    KATZ, BM
    MCSWEENEY, M
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1980, 40 (04) : 845 - 857
  • [9] INTELLIGENCE AND EXPERIENCE - NEO-PIAGETIAN APPROACH
    PASCUALLEONE, J
    GOODMAN, D
    [J]. INSTRUCTIONAL SCIENCE, 1979, 8 (04) : 301 - 367
  • [10] A NEO-PIAGETIAN ANALYSIS OF COMMUNICATION PERFORMANCE IN YOUNG-CHILDREN
    FOORMAN, BR
    [J]. GENETIC PSYCHOLOGY MONOGRAPHS, 1982, 105 (01): : 3 - 24